CVE-2022-20049
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn vpu, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS05954679; Issue ID: ALPS05954679.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a MediaTek VPU (Video Processing Unit) driver vulnerability where a missing permission check allows local privilege escalation. An attacker with System-level execution privileges can exploit this to gain elevated privileges without user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.0= 11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm MediaTek VPU driver presenceIdentify if the device uses a MediaTek chipset with VPU (Video Processing Unit) driver. Check /proc/devices or system logs for vpu-related entries, or use 'getprop' to check hardware details.Affected if Device runs on MediaTek hardware with VPU driver loaded and Android version is 10.0 or 11.0
-
Verify Android versionRun 'getprop ro.build.version.release' or check Settings > About Phone > Android version.Affected if Android version is exactly 10.0 or 11.0 (the affected versions)
-
Check VPU driver is accessibleInspect /dev/ or /sys/class/ for VPU-related device nodes. Look for entries containing 'vpu', 'mdev', or video processing device nodes accessible from userspace.Affected if VPU device nodes exist and are accessible at system level without additional authentication
-
Confirm System-level execution accessVerify the attacker has System-level privileges (not just root) by checking process capabilities via 'ps -A' or checking if the exploit payload can be executed at System privilege level.Affected if Attacker can execute code at System privilege level on the affected Android version with vulnerable VPU driver
-
Check for vendor security patch levelRun 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' to see the installed security patch level. Compare against the date of ALPS05954679 patch availability.Affected if Security patch level is older than the vendor fix, and VPU driver is present on Android 10.0 or 11.0
A user is affected if their Android device runs version 10.0 or 11.0 on MediaTek hardware with the vulnerable VPU driver, and the missing permission check (patch ALPS05954679) has not been applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch ALPS05954679 to the VPU driver. This patch adds the missing permission check to prevent unauthorized access to privileged VPU operations.
Android Security Patch Level March 2022 or later (device-specific)
- Check your Android device's build number in Settings > About Phone to identify the current Android version and security patch level
- Contact your device manufacturer (e.g., Xiaomi, Oppo, Vivo, Realme) to verify if a security update containing MediaTek patch ALPS05954679 has been released for your specific device model
- If your device manufacturer has released an update, apply the latest available Android security update through Settings > System > Software Update
- For enterprise or managed devices, work with your mobile device management (MDM) administrator to push the latest security patch update to your device
- Verify the patch has been applied by checking Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level after updating
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20049 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20049 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data