CVE-2022-2025
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedan attacker with knowledge of user/pass of Grandstream GSD3710 in its 1.0.11.13 version, could overflow the stack since it doesn't check the param length before use the strcopy instruction. The explotation of this vulnerability may lead an attacker to execute a shell with full access.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStack-based buffer overflow in Grandstream GSD3710 firmware 1.0.11.13 where the authentication handler fails to validate parameter length before copying user credentials into a fixed-size buffer via strcpy, allowing an authenticated attacker to overwrite stack memory and achieve remote code execution with full system privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.11.13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the device web interface or check the physical device label to confirm it is a Grandstream GSD3710 recording serverAffected if The device is not a Grandstream GSD3710, then this CVE does not apply
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the device web interface and navigate to System > Firmware/Upgrade, or use the command line and run 'show version' or check /etc/version to retrieve the firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is exactly 1.0.11.13 - only this specific version is affected
-
Verify the authentication interface is network-accessibleCheck the device network configuration for the management interface bind address, or verify network exposure by attempting to reach the authentication endpoint from an external IPAffected if The authentication handler is reachable from untrusted networks (WAN or untrusted LAN segments)
-
Confirm remote management is enabledIn the web interface, go to Network > Remote Management or similar settings, or check the configuration file for enable_remote_management or web_remote_access settingsAffected if Remote management or web access from WAN is enabled, exposing the vulnerable authentication handler
You are affected if the device is a Grandstream GSD3710 running firmware version 1.0.11.13 and the authentication interface is network-accessible to an attacker who could obtain valid credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware patch when available; until then, restrict network access to the device management interface to trusted IPs only, disable remote management over WAN, and monitor for indicators of compromise.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-2025 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-2025 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data