CVE-2022-2030
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA directory traversal vulnerability caused by specific character sequences within an improperly sanitized URL was identified in some CGI programs of Zyxel USG FLEX 100(W) firmware versions 4.50 through 5.30, USG FLEX 200 firmware versions 4.50 through 5.30, USG FLEX 500 firmware versions 4.50 through 5.30, USG FLEX 700 firmware versions 4.50 through 5.30, USG FLEX 50(W) firmware versions 4.16 through 5.30, USG20(W)-VPN firmware versions 4.16 through 5.30, ATP series firmware versions 4.32 through 5.30, VPN series firmware versions 4.30 through 5.30, USG/ZyWALL series firmware versions 4.11 through 4.72, that could allow an authenticated attacker to access some restricted files on a vulnerable device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA directory traversal vulnerability exists in CGI programs of multiple Zyxel USG FLEX, ATP, and VPN series firewall devices due to improper sanitization of specific character sequences in URLs. An authenticated attacker can exploit this by crafting malicious URLs with traversal sequences (e.g., ../) to access restricted files outside the intended web root directory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.50, <= 5.30>= 4.50, <= 5.30>= 4.50, <= 5.30>= 4.50, <= 5.30>= 4.20, <= 5.30>= 4.20, <= 5.30>= 4.32, <= 5.30>= 4.32, <= 5.30CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Zyxel device modelAccess the device web interface (usually via https://<device-ip>/) and check the dashboard or status page for the model name, or use CLI command 'show system-info' or 'sysinfo' to retrieve model informationAffected if The device is not one of the following: USG Flex 100w, USG Flex 200, USG Flex 500, USG Flex 700, USG Flex 50w, USG20w VPN, ATP800, or ATP700
-
Retrieve the current firmware versionIn the web interface, navigate to Maintenance > Firmware or Status > Device Info to view the firmware version. In CLI, use 'show system-info' or 'fwver' commandAffected if Unable to retrieve firmware version or version is unknown
-
Compare firmware version against affected rangesCheck if the installed firmware version falls within any of these ranges: USG Flex 100w/200/500/700: 4.50 to 5.30; USG Flex 50w/USG20w VPN: 4.20 to 5.30; ATP800/ATP700: 4.32 to 5.30Affected if The firmware version is within any of the listed ranges (>=4.50 and <=5.30 for 100w/200/500/700; >=4.20 and <=5.30 for 50w/USG20w; >=4.32 and <=5.30 for ATP700/ATP800)
-
Confirm web interface and CGI programs are enabledVerify the device web interface is accessible by navigating to https://<device-ip>/ in a browser. The vulnerability exists in CGI programs, so ensure the HTTP/HTTPS service is running. In CLI, use 'show service' to confirm web services are enabledAffected if The web interface (HTTP/HTTPS) is disabled or not accessible
The device is affected if it is one of the listed models (USG Flex 100w/200/500/700/50w, USG20w VPN, ATP700, ATP800) AND its firmware version falls within the specified vulnerable ranges AND the web interface is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware updates (latest patches address this vulnerability). If immediate patching is not feasible, limit administrative interface access to trusted IP addresses and implement web application firewall rules to detect and block directory traversal patterns.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-2030 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-2030 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data