CVE-2022-20576
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn externalOnRequest of rilapplication.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android kernelAndroid ID: A-239701761References: N/A
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOut-of-bounds write vulnerability in Android's Radio Interface Layer (RIL) component, specifically in the externalOnRequest function of rilapplication.cpp. The vulnerability stems from a missing bounds check that allows writing beyond allocated buffer boundaries. A local attacker with System-level execution privileges could exploit this for privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Android security patch levelGo to Settings > About Phone > Security Patch Level or run 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' via ADBAffected if The patch level is earlier than December 2022 or the CVE publication date indicates the fix is not applied
-
Verify Android versionGo to Settings > About Phone > Android version or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADBAffected if Any version of Android is listed as affected per the CVE; however, versions without the December 2022 or later security update remain vulnerable
-
Confirm RIL component presenceCheck for the presence of libril.so or rild daemon by running 'ls /system/lib64/libril.so' or 'ps -A | grep rild' via ADBAffected if The RIL component exists (which it does on all standard Android phones); the vulnerability is present if the security patch is not applied
-
Check system privileges accessDetermine if any untrusted applications have System-level execution privileges via 'dumpsys package' for installed packages with SYSTEM privileges, noting that exploitation requires System-level accessAffected if An attacker with System-level privileges exists on the device and the security patch is not applied
The environment is affected if the Android security patch level is earlier than the December 2022 Android Security Bulletin that addressed CVE-2022-20576, since this is a platform-level flaw in the RIL component requiring system-level access to exploit.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Android security patch for the relevant Android version. This is a platform-level vulnerability fixed through Google's monthly security updates, not through customer-side code changes.
Latest available Android version with February 2023 Security Patch Level or later
- Check current Android version by navigating to Settings > About Phone > Android version
- Ensure the device has the latest system updates installed by checking Settings > System > Software Update or Settings > About Phone > Software Update
- Apply the February 2023 Android Security Patch Level (SPL) or later, which contains the fix for A-239701761
- Verify the patch was applied by checking Settings > About Phone > Security patch level - it should show February 2023 or later
- If the device manufacturer has not released an update containing this patch, consider upgrading to a device model that receives regular security updates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20576 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20576 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data