CVE-2022-20579
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn RadioImpl::setCdmaBroadcastConfig of ril_service_legacy.cpp, there is a possible stack clash leading to memory corruption. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.Product: AndroidVersions: Android kernelAndroid ID: A-243510139References: N/A
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA stack clash vulnerability exists in RadioImpl::setCdmaBroadcastConfig in ril_service_legacy.cpp where improper buffer handling in the Radio Interface Layer allows a stack buffer to overflow and corrupt adjacent stack memory, potentially enabling a local attacker with System privileges to escalate to higher privileges through memory corruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Android RIL component presenceCheck if /vendor/lib64/libril*.so or /system/lib64/libril*.so exists on the device. This library contains the Radio Interface Layer where the vulnerability resides.Affected if The libril shared library exists on the device - the vulnerable code path is present in the RIL implementation.
-
Confirm ril_service_legacy.cpp compiled into RILInspect the libril.so or librilutils.so library for the presence of 'setCdmaBroadcastConfig' symbol using 'strings <library> | grep setCdmaBroadcastConfig' or nm command if available.Affected if The setCdmaBroadcastConfig function symbol is found in the RIL library, indicating the vulnerable code is compiled into the deployed RIL.
-
Check if CDMA broadcast feature is enabledExamine /system/etc/permissions/android.hardware.telephony.gsm.xml or /vendor/etc/permissions/*.xml for CDMA broadcast-related permissions, or check if the device has CDMA capability via 'getprop | grep -i cdma'.Affected if The device supports CDMA and has the broadcast configuration feature available - this is the attack surface for the overflow.
-
Verify RIL daemon runs with elevated privilegesCheck RIL daemon process privileges via 'ps -A | grep rild' and review SELinux context; the vulnerability requires System-level privileges to exploit.Affected if The rild process runs with System privileges (not isolated), enabling the privilege escalation path described in the CVE.
A device is affected if it runs any Android version with the Radio Interface Layer containing the setCdmaBroadcastConfig function and supports CDMA broadcast functionality, since exploitation requires System privileges access to trigger the stack buffer overflow.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-provided Android security patches addressing A-243510139; if unavailable, audit and add proper bounds checking around all stack buffers in setCdmaBroadcastConfig and related RIL functions, and consider enabling stack canaries.
Android Security Patch Level January 2023 or later (contact device manufacturer for specific update availability)
- Check the current Android security patch level on the device in Settings > About Phone > Android version or Settings > Security > Security update
- Update the device to the latest available Android security update. For this vulnerability, the fix was released in the January 2023 Android Security Bulletin (or later)
- Verify after update that the security patch level includes the fix for Android ID A-243510139
- If the device manufacturer has not released an update containing this fix, consider upgrading to a device model that receives regular security updates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20579 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20579 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data