CVE-2022-20619
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Bitbucket Branch Source Plugin 737.vdf9dc06105be and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins Bitbucket Branch Source Plugin 737.vdf9dc06105be and earlier allows authenticated users to be tricked into making unintended requests that connect to attacker-controlled URLs using credentials IDs the attacker has obtained separately, enabling exfiltration of stored Jenkins credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.9.10= 737.vdf9dc06105beCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Bitbucket Branch Source Plugin is installedIn Jenkins, go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'Bitbucket Branch Source'. Alternatively, check the file system for the plugin at $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/ directory for a folder named 'bitbucket-branch-source'.Affected if The plugin appears in the installed list or the plugin folder exists in the plugins directory.
-
Determine the installed plugin versionIn the Manage Plugins > Installed tab, locate Bitbucket Branch Source and read the Version column. If using CLI, check $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/bitbucket-branch-source/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF for the 'Plugin-Version' attribute.Affected if The version number is 2.9.10 or lower, or exactly 737.vdf9dc06105be.
-
Verify if the plugin is active and not disabledIn Manage Plugins > Installed tab, ensure Bitbucket Branch Source is not listed as 'Disabled'. An enabled plugin can be exploited even if not actively used in jobs.Affected if The plugin is installed and not explicitly disabled.
-
Check for credentials configured with Bitbucket Branch SourceGo to Manage Jenkins > Manage Credentials. Review any credentials with kind 'Username with password', 'SSH Username with private key', or 'Secret text' that are used for Bitbucket Cloud or Bitbucket Server integrations. Also check individual job or folder configurations under 'Branch Sources' for active Bitbucket credential usage.Affected if Credentials IDs for Bitbucket integration exist in Jenkins credentials store or are referenced in job configurations.
If the Bitbucket Branch Source Plugin is installed at version 2.9.10 or lower (or version 737.vdf9dc06105be), is enabled, and has credentials configured for Bitbucket connections, the environment is vulnerable to credential exfiltration via CSRF.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade the Bitbucket Branch Source Plugin to a version newer than 737.vdf9dc06105be. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, disable the plugin until patched and review Jenkins credentials for unauthorized access.
Bitbucket Branch Source Plugin version 2.9.11 or later
- 1. In the Jenkins dashboard, navigate to 'Manage Jenkins' → 'Manage Plugins'
- 2. Go to the 'Installed' tab and locate 'Bitbucket Branch Source Plugin'
- 3. If the plugin shows version 2.9.10 or earlier, an update is available
- 4. Select the plugin and click 'Update' to upgrade to the fixed version
- 5. After the update completes, restart Jenkins to apply the changes
- 6. Verify the new version is installed by checking the plugin manager again
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20619 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20619 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data