CVE-2022-20635
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Security Manager could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct cross-site scripting attacks against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMultiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Cisco Security Manager's web-based management interface allow unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious script code via crafted links. The vulnerabilities stem from insufficient validation of user-supplied input in the web interface. Successful exploitation enables arbitrary script execution in the context of the interface or access to sensitive browser-based information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 4.24CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Cisco Security Manager is installedIdentify whether Cisco Security Manager is deployed in your environment by checking for the application processes or installed components.Affected if The software is present and the web interface is in use.
-
Determine the installed versionAccess the web-based management interface and navigate to the version information page, or use the application's built-in about or help function to retrieve the current version number.Affected if The installed version is lower than 4.24.
-
Verify the web interface is enabledConfirm that the web-based management interface is currently active and accessible, typically on ports 443 or 8443.Affected if The web interface is enabled and running.
-
Check network accessibilityDetermine whether the management interface is reachable from outside trusted network segments or the internet.Affected if The interface is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet without proper access controls.
You are affected if Cisco Security Manager is installed with the web interface enabled and the version is below 4.24, especially if the interface is accessible to untrusted users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.24
Apply the vendor patch released by Cisco for Security Manager. Until patched, consider deploying a web application firewall (WAF) or implementing input validation controls as a temporary mitigation.
4.24 or later
- 1. Identify current Cisco Security Manager version by accessing the web interface or checking the installed software.
- 2. Confirm the installed version is below 4.24, which is affected by this CVE.
- 3. Review Cisco Security Manager upgrade documentation and release notes for version 4.24 or later.
- 4. Plan the upgrade considering maintenance windows and backup requirements.
- 5. Perform a complete backup of the current Security Manager configuration.
- 6. Upgrade Cisco Security Manager to version 4.24 or the latest stable release.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the web-based management interface is accessible and validate the version number.
- 8. Test that the XSS vulnerability is no longer present by attempting benign input validation in the interface.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20635 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20635 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data