CVE-2022-20656
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco PI and Cisco EPNM could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a path traversal attack on an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid credentials on the system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of the HTTPS URL by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request that contains directory traversal character sequences to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to write arbitrary files to the host system. Cisco has released software updates that address these vulnerabilities. There are no workarounds that address these vulnerabilities.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA path traversal vulnerability in Cisco Prime Infrastructure (PI) and Cisco EPNM web-based management interface allows authenticated remote attackers to use directory traversal sequences (e.g., ../../../') in crafted HTTPS requests. Due to insufficient input validation of the URL parameter, the vulnerability enables writing arbitrary files to the host file system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0.0= 2.1= 2.2= 3.0.0= 3.1.0= 3.1.5= 3.2= 3.2.0-fips= 3.3.0= 3.4.0= 3.5.0= 3.6.0= 1.1= 1.2= 2.0= 2.1= 2.2= 3.0= 3.0.1= 3.0.2= 3.0.3= 3.1= 3.1.1= 3.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Cisco network management productCheck the system for Cisco Prime Infrastructure or Cisco Evolved Programmable Network Manager (EPNM) installations. Look for application directories, service names, or check installed software packages using system inventory tools.Affected if Neither Cisco Prime Infrastructure nor EPNM is installed on the system.
-
Determine the installed version of Cisco PI or EPNMAccess the web-based management interface and navigate to the About or Version page, or use the command line interface if available (e.g., 'show version' or checking installation logs). Compare the version number against the affected ranges.Affected if The installed version matches: Cisco PI = 2.0.0, 2.1, 2.2, 3.0.0, 3.1.0, 3.1.5, 3.2, 3.2.0-fips, 3.3.0, 3.4.0, 3.5.0, 3.6.0 OR EPNM = 1.1, 1.2, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 3.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, 3.0.3, 3.1, 3.1.1, 3.1.2.
-
Verify the web-based management interface is accessibleConfirm the HTTPS web management interface is enabled and reachable. Check if the service is running and accessible via browser or curl to the management URL.Affected if The web-based management interface is not exposed or is disabled.
-
Review web server access logs for directory traversal patternsExamine HTTP/HTTPS access logs for the management interface. Search for URL patterns containing '../' or directory traversal sequences, especially in requests to writable endpoints.Affected if Logs show directory traversal attempts ('../' sequences) in URL parameters targeting the management interface.
You are affected if Cisco Prime Infrastructure or EPNM is installed with a version matching the listed affected versions AND the web-based management interface is accessible to authenticated users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco software updates released to address this vulnerability. No workarounds are available.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20656 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20656 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data