CVE-2022-20666
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Common Services Platform Collector (CSPC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user of the interface to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Cisco CSPC web-based management interface allow unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious scripts via crafted links. The vulnerabilities stem from insufficient validation of user-supplied input, enabling script execution in the context of the interface or access to sensitive browser-based information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.10.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Cisco CSPC installation existsCheck for Cisco CSPC installation directories, running processes, or installed services on the system. Look for processes named 'cspc' or installation folders containing 'CSPC' or 'Common Services Platform Collector'.Affected if The software is present on the system
-
Determine installed CSPC versionAccess the CSPC web management interface and navigate to the About or Version page, or use the command-line interface if available to retrieve the software version number.Affected if The installed version is below 2.10.0.2 (e.g., 2.9.x, 2.8.x, etc.)
-
Confirm web-based management interface is enabledVerify that the CSPC web-based management interface is running and accessible by attempting to reach the login page or checking if the web service is active on the system.Affected if The web interface is enabled and reachable on the network
-
Check network exposure of management interfaceDetermine if the CSPC web interface is exposed to untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules, network configurations, or access control lists that govern who can reach the management port.Affected if The interface is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet
A user is affected if Cisco CSPC is installed with a version lower than 2.10.0.2 and the web-based management interface is enabled and reachable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.10.0.2
Users should avoid clicking untrusted links; administrators should apply Cisco-provided patches when released and implement Content Security Policy headers as a defense-in-depth measure.
CSPC version 2.10.0.2 or later
- Back up the current CSPC configuration and database to ensure data can be recovered if needed
- Access the Cisco website or Cisco Smart Software Manager to download CSPC version 2.10.0.2 or later
- Log into the CSPC web-based management interface as an administrator
- Navigate to the software upgrade or administration section
- Upload and install the downloaded CSPC software version 2.10.0.2 or later
- After upgrade completion, restart the CSPC services if prompted
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the software version in the management interface
- Confirm that the web-based management interface is functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20666 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20666 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data