CVE-2022-20703
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers could allow an attacker to do any of the following: Execute arbitrary code Elevate privileges Execute arbitrary commands Bypass authentication and authorization protections Fetch and run unsigned software Cause denial of service (DoS) For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple critical vulnerabilities exist in Cisco Small Business RV160, RV260, RV340, and RV345 Series Routers firmware. These vulnerabilities allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or commands, elevate privileges, bypass authentication mechanisms, fetch and execute unsigned software, or cause denial of service. The attack vector appears to be network-adjacent or remote, exploiting weaknesses in the router firmware's input validation, authentication, or authorization logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.0.03.24<= 1.0.03.24<= 1.0.03.24<= 1.0.03.24<= 1.0.01.05<= 1.0.01.05<= 1.0.01.05<= 1.0.01.05CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify router modelLog into the router web interface or CLI and locate the device model number (RV160, RV160w, RV260, RV260p, RV340, RV340w, RV345, or RV345p)Affected if Router model is one of the RV series models listed in the affected products
-
Check firmware version via web interfaceNavigate to the router administration page, typically at https://[router-ip]/ and look for a Status or System Summary page that displays the firmware versionAffected if Firmware version cannot be determined or does not display clearly
-
Check firmware version via CLIAccess router via SSH or console, log in, and run the command 'show version' or 'get system version' to retrieve the firmware build numberAffected if CLI access is unavailable and web interface version display is unclear
-
Compare version against affected rangesCompare your installed firmware version to: RV340/RV340w/RV345/RV345p = 1.0.03.24 or lower; RV160/RV160w/RV260/RV260p = 1.0.01.05 or lowerAffected if Installed version is at or below the threshold for your specific model (e.g., 1.0.03.24 or lower for RV340/RV345 series, 1.0.01.05 or lower for RV160/RV260 series)
-
Verify management interface exposureCheck router network settings to determine if the management web interface (HTTP/HTTPS) or SSH is accessible from WAN or untrusted networks rather than only from trusted LAN segmentsAffected if Management interface is reachable from WAN or untrusted networks (this increases exposure risk for the vulnerabilities)
You are affected if your router is an RV160, RV260, RV340, or RV345 model running firmware at or below the version thresholds (1.0.01.05 for RV160/RV260 series, 1.0.03.24 for RV340/RV345 series).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Cisco firmware updates for the affected RV series routers as soon as they become available. Until patches are applied, limit router management interface exposure to trusted networks and monitor for indicators of compromise.
Firmware newer than 1.0.03.24 for RV340/RV345 series; Firmware newer than 1.0.01.05 for RV160/RV260 series (consult Cisco advisory for exact fixed release)
- Identify the exact model of Cisco Small Business router from the RV160, RV260, RV340, or RV345 series
- Access the Cisco Software Downloads page for your specific router model
- Download the latest available firmware version that addresses security vulnerabilities
- Follow Cisco's standard firmware upgrade procedure: backup current configuration, upload new firmware via web UI or CLI, verify upgrade integrity, restore configuration if needed
- After upgrade, verify the router is functioning normally and the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20703 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20703 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data