CVE-2022-20778
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the authentication component of Cisco Webex Meetings could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based interface. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based interface of the authentication component of Cisco Webex Meetings. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a maliciously crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA reflected XSS vulnerability exists in the authentication component web interface of Cisco Webex Meetings. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of user-supplied input, allowing unauthenticated attackers to embed malicious script through crafted links that execute in the context of the victim's browser when clicked.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Webex Meetings authentication URLsLocate all URLs accessing the Webex Meetings authentication interface, typically under paths such as /login, /webex/login, or the primary Webex domain hosting the login portal. Inventory all registered Webex hostnames or aliases in your environment.Affected if Any Cisco Webex Meetings authentication interface is accessible on the network.
-
Confirm the authentication web interface is reachableAttempt to access the identified Webex authentication URL via HTTP/HTTPS from a test client to verify the login page loads. Record the full URL including any path and query parameters displayed in the browser address bar.Affected if The authentication page loads and accepts user input via URL parameters.
-
Inspect if URL parameters are reflected in the responseSubmit a test query parameter with a harmless marker (such as ?testparam=TESTMARKER) to the authentication URL, then retrieve the response page source. Search the response body for the exact string TESTMARKER appearing without encoding, entity transformation, or removal.Affected if The submitted parameter value appears verbatim in the HTML response without being escaped or sanitized.
-
Check for Cisco security patch statusReview Cisco product security notices for CVE-2022-20778 and confirm whether your specific Webex Meetings deployment version has the vendor patch applied. Consult release notes or security advisories from Cisco for the applied Webex version.Affected if The installed version is confirmed unpatched for this CVE or no patch confirmation is available.
If the Webex authentication interface is accessible and URL parameters are reflected into the HTML response without encoding, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2022-20778.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-provided security patch from Cisco. Until patched, users should be cautioned against clicking untrusted links to the Webex authentication interface. Implementing output encoding and input validation on the authentication portal will remediate the underlying code flaw.
Refer to Cisco advisory for Cisco Webex Meetings specific fixed release
- Navigate to the Cisco Security Advisories page at tools.cisco.com
- Search for CVE-2022-20778 to locate the specific security advisory
- Follow the remediation guidance provided in the Cisco advisory for your deployment type
- Apply the recommended update or configuration change
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20778 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20778 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data