CVE-2022-20804
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Cisco Discovery Protocol of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) and Cisco Unified Communications Manager Session Management Edition (Unified CM SME) could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a kernel panic on an affected system, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to incorrect processing of certain Cisco Discovery Protocol packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by continuously sending certain Cisco Discovery Protocol packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a kernel panic on the system that is running the affected software, resulting in a DoS condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco Discovery Protocol processing in Cisco Unified Communications Manager and Unified CM Session Management Edition allows an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a kernel panic by sending specially crafted CDP packets, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 14.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed productRun 'show version' or check the system dashboard to confirm the product name is Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) or Unified CM Session Management Edition (SME)Affected if The product is not CUCM or CUCM SME
-
Check the CUCM versionRun 'show version' or access the Cisco Unified OS Administration console to retrieve the installed version numberAffected if The version is 14.0 or lower (any version <= 14.0)
-
Verify Cisco Discovery Protocol statusRun 'show cdp neighbor' or access the Cisco Unified Serviceability interface to check if CDP is enabled on the affected interfacesAffected if CDP is enabled and running on any interface
-
Assess network exposureReview the network topology and VLAN configuration to determine if untrusted adjacent attackers can reach the CUCM systemAffected if The CUCM system is on a network segment accessible to untrusted adjacent attackers
A system is affected if it is running Cisco Unified Communications Manager or CUCM Session Management Edition version 14.0 or lower with Cisco Discovery Protocol enabled, and the system is accessible to adjacent attackers on the same network segment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Cisco patch for this vulnerability; until patched, consider network segmentation to limit adjacent attacker access to the affected systems.
Cisco Unified CM 14.0(1) SU3 or later (or 14.0(2) if available for your deployment)
- 1. Identify the current Unified Communications Manager version by accessing the Cisco Unified CM Administration interface and navigating to the About page
- 2. Review the Cisco Security Advisory for CVE-2022-20804 at tools.cisco.com to confirm the specific fixed version for your deployment type (Unified CM or Unified CM SME)
- 3. Plan maintenance window as the upgrade will require system downtime
- 4. Back up the Unified CM database and configuration using the Disaster Recovery System (DRS)
- 5. If running Unified CM version 14.0, upgrade to version 14.0(1) SU3 or later by accessing the Cisco Software Download page and obtaining the appropriate .iso file
- 6. Install the upgrade via the Unified CM Operating System Administration interface or command line using the command: utils system upgrade /var/software/upgrade.iso
- 7. Verify the installation completed successfully and the system is operational
- 8. Confirm the version now shows the patched release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20804 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20804 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data