CVE-2022-20806
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in the API and web-based management interfaces of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to write files or disclose sensitive information on an affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple vulnerabilities in the API and web-based management interfaces of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) allow an authenticated, remote attacker to write arbitrary files to the device filesystem or disclose sensitive information. The vulnerabilities stem from insufficient validation of user inputs in the management interfaces.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= x14.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the productCheck if the system is Cisco Expressway Series or Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS). Access the web管理界面 or use CLI command 'xStatus' to confirm the product name.Affected if The device is not Cisco Expressway Series or Cisco TelePresence VCS, this CVE does not apply.
-
Check the installed versionLog into the web管理界面 and navigate to 'System' > 'Product ID' or use CLI command 'version' to retrieve the software version. Compare against the affected range: Cisco Telepresence VCS <= x14.0.7.Affected if The installed version is x14.0.7 or lower for VCS, or falls within any unpatched Expressway Series version in that range.
-
Verify management interface is enabledCheck via web UI at 'System' > 'Administration' > 'HTTP/HTTPS service settings' or use CLI command 'xConfiguration HTTP Proxy' to confirm the web-based management interface is turned on.Affected if The web management interface is disabled; the attack surface is reduced but the vulnerability still exists in the software if a future enablement occurs.
-
Confirm management access is not restrictedReview network access controls at 'System' > 'Administration' > 'Access' > 'IP address restriction' or check firewall rules to see if management interface is exposed to untrusted networks.Affected if Management interface is reachable from untrusted networks (such as the internet) without VPN or IP restrictions, increasing exploitability.
You are affected if you run Cisco Expressway Series or VCS with version <= x14.0.7 and have the web management interface enabled and accessible, even internally.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Cisco-provided patches for Expressway Series and VCS devices. Restrict access to management interfaces to trusted networks or use VPN. Ensure strong authentication is enforced for management access.
Cisco TelePresence VCS x14.0.8 or later
- 1. Back up the current VCS configuration and any critical data
- 2. Review Cisco release notes for the x14.0.8 or later release for any pre-upgrade requirements
- 3. Download the Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server x14.0.8 or later from Cisco (requires valid CCO account)
- 4. Access the VCS admin interface and navigate to Maintenance > Upgrade
- 5. Upload and apply the upgrade package
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful and confirm the new version number
- 7. Test that all services and interfaces are functioning properly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20806 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20806 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data