CVE-2022-20807
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in the API and web-based management interfaces of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to write files or disclose sensitive information on an affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple vulnerabilities in the API and web-based management interfaces of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server allow an authenticated, remote attacker to write arbitrary files to the device filesystem or disclose sensitive information. The attacker needs valid credentials to exploit these interface vulnerabilities.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= x14.0.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the productCheck if the device is a Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server or Cisco Expressway Series by reviewing the device inventory, network documentation, or accessing the device web interface and noting the product name displayed.Affected if The device is not a Cisco TelePresence VCS or Cisco Expressway Series product.
-
Determine the installed versionLog into the Cisco TelePresence VCS web interface (typically https://<device-ip>) and navigate to the version information page, or use the CLI command 'xversion' to display the exact software version.Affected if The installed version is x14.0.7 or lower, or any version of x14 earlier than the fixed release.
-
Verify web-based management interface statusCheck if the web-based management interface is enabled by reviewing the device configuration under 'System' > 'Administration' settings in the web UI, or via CLI using 'httpd' or similar configuration commands.Affected if The web-based management interface is enabled and accessible (this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable).
-
Check API interface accessibilityReview the device configuration to determine if the REST API or other programmatic interfaces are exposed, typically found under 'Configuration' > 'API' settings in the web interface.Affected if The API interface is enabled and accessible over the network.
-
Confirm network exposureReview firewall rules, access lists, or network segmentation to determine if the management interfaces are reachable from network segments outside trusted administration networks.Affected if Management interfaces are reachable from untrusted networks (this increases exposure risk but the vulnerability exists regardless).
Your environment is affected if you are running Cisco TelePresence VCS at version x14.0.7 or lower, or any Cisco Expressway Series version with the web-based management or API interfaces enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Cisco security updates for Expressway Series and TelePresence VCS as referenced in the Cisco advisory. Restrict access to management interfaces to trusted networks and enforce strong authentication credentials.
x14.0.8 or later (check Cisco.com for exact fixed release)
- 1. Review the Cisco security advisory on tools.cisco.com for complete vulnerability details and remediation guidance
- 2. Contact Cisco TAC or check Cisco.com for the specific fixed release version for x14.x
- 3. Plan upgrade during maintenance window following Cisco upgrade procedures
- 4. After upgrade, verify the fix by reviewing system logs to confirm sensitive information is no longer being logged
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20807 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20807 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data