CVE-2022-20853
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the REST API of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence VCS could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the REST API to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected system to reload. Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCSRF vulnerability in Cisco Expressway Series and TelePresence VCS REST API due to insufficient CSRF protection in the web-based management interface. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by tricking an authenticated user into following a crafted link, causing the affected system to reload.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= x8.1= x8.1.1= x8.1.2= x8.2= x8.2.1= x8.2.2= x8.5= x8.5.1= x8.5.2= x8.5.3= x8.6= x8.6.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of Cisco Telepresence VCSLog into the web-based management interface and navigate to the version or system information page, or use the CLI command to display the software version (typically 'version' or 'show systemunit' command).Affected if The displayed version matches any of the following: x8.1, x8.1.1, x8.1.2, x8.2, x8.2.1, x8.2.2, x8.5, x8.5.1, x8.5.2, x8.5.3, x8.6, or x8.6.1
-
Confirm the web-based management interface is accessibleAttempt to access the management interface via HTTPS or HTTP on the default ports (typically 443 or 80) using the system's IP address or hostname.Affected if The management interface is reachable from a network where potential attackers could trick an authenticated user into visiting a crafted link
-
Determine if the REST API is enabledCheck the system configuration pages within the web management interface for REST API or API access settings, or attempt to access common API endpoints such as /putxml or /getxml.Affected if The REST API is enabled and accessible without additional authentication beyond the session cookie
-
Check for CSRF protection mechanisms in the interfaceInspect the HTML source of authenticated management pages for CSRF tokens (look for hidden form fields with names like 'csrf_token', 'token', or similar, or check request headers for anti-CSRF measures).Affected if No CSRF tokens are present in administrative forms or the application does not validate the Origin/Referer headers on POST requests
Your environment is affected if the installed Cisco Telepresence VCS version is one of the listed affected versions AND the web-based management interface or REST API is accessible to users who could be targeted by CSRF attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Cisco software updates that address this vulnerability. No workarounds are available.
Upgrade to a version newer than x8.2 (contact Cisco for the exact fixed release)
- Contact Cisco support or visit the Cisco security advisory page for CVE-2022-20853 to obtain the specific fixed version
- Download the recommended software update for your Cisco TelePresence VCS or Expressway Series device
- Upload the firmware/software update via the web-based management interface or CLI
- Reboot the device as required by the update process
- Verify the system is running the patched version after reboot
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20853 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20853 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data