CVE-2022-20867
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in web-based management interface of the of Cisco Email Security Appliance and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct SQL injection attacks as root on an affected system. The attacker must have the credentials of a high-privileged user account. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-submitted parameters. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to the application and sending malicious requests to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain data or modify data that is stored in the underlying database of the affected system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAuthenticated SQL injection vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager web-based management interface. Due to improper validation of user-submitted parameters, an attacker with high-privileged credentials can inject malicious SQL queries that execute with root privileges on the underlying database, allowing unauthorized data extraction or modification.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.0, < 14.2.1>= 12.0, < 14.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify web-based management interface is accessibleConfirm the Cisco Email Security Appliance or Secure Email and Web Manager web management interface is reachable on your network. This is the attack surface for the SQL injection.Affected if The web management interface is exposed and accessible to the attacker.
-
Identify the AsyncOS versionLog into the appliance CLI or web interface and locate the AsyncOS version number. In the CLI, this is typically shown in the system overview or by running 'version' command.Affected if The installed AsyncOS version cannot be determined or is not visible.
-
Compare installed version against affected rangesCheck if your AsyncOS version falls within: 12.0 <= version < 14.2.0 OR 13.0 <= version < 14.2.1. Any version in these ranges is affected by the vulnerability.Affected if Your AsyncOS version is 12.x below 14.2.0, or 13.x below 14.2.1.
-
Determine if high-privileged management accounts existReview user accounts in the web management interface under the Users or Mail Users section. Identify accounts with Administrator or high-privilege roles.Affected if High-privileged accounts with administrative access exist in the system.
If the web management interface is exposed AND your AsyncOS version is 12.x < 14.2.0 or 13.x < 14.2.1 AND high-privileged accounts are present, you are affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped14.2.014.2.1
Apply Cisco security patches/updates for this vulnerability. Restrict access to the management interface to trusted networks and follow least-privilege principles for user accounts.
AsyncOS 14.2.1 (for 13.x branch) or AsyncOS 14.2.0 (for 12.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current AsyncOS version by navigating to the appliance's web interface or using the CLI command: version
- 2. For AsyncOS 12.x versions: Plan upgrade to AsyncOS 14.2.0 or later
- 3. For AsyncOS 13.x versions: Plan upgrade to AsyncOS 14.2.1 or later
- 4. Back up the current configuration using the saveconfig CLI command before upgrading
- 5. Download the appropriate AsyncOS upgrade image from Cisco (requires valid service contract)
- 6. Upload the upgrade file via the web interface (System Administration > Update Appliance) or via CLI using the upgrade command
- 7. Run the upgrade and confirm the new version after reboot using the version command
- 8. Verify the web-based management interface is accessible and functioning normally
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20867 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20867 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data