CVE-2022-20953
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco TelePresence Collaboration Endpoint (CE) Software and Cisco RoomOS Software could allow an attacker to conduct path traversal attacks, view sensitive data, or write arbitrary files on an affected device. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco TelePresence Collaboration Endpoint (CE) Software and Cisco RoomOS Software allow path traversal attacks, unauthenticated viewing of sensitive data, and writing arbitrary files to the filesystem on affected devices. These file system vulnerabilities could enable an attacker to escape intended directory restrictions, access confidential information, and place malicious files on the device, potentially leading to broader compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.19.1all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your device product typeAccess the device CLI and run 'show version' or use the web interface to determine if the device is running Cisco TelePresence Collaboration Endpoint (CE) Software or Cisco RoomOS SoftwareAffected if The device is either Cisco TelePresence CE or Cisco RoomOS
-
Check the installed software versionRun 'show version' in the device CLI or check the web interface System Information page. Note the exact version number (for CE) or any version string (for RoomOS)Affected if For TelePresence CE: version is below 10.19.1. For RoomOS: any version is affected (all versions)
-
Verify management interface exposureCheck the device network configuration by running 'xconfiguration Network' or reviewing the web interface Network Settings. Determine if HTTP/HTTPS management ports are accessible from untrusted networksAffected if The device management interface (typically ports 80/443) is exposed to the internet or untrusted VLANs, providing an attack vector for the path traversal and file access vulnerabilities
-
Review access logs for suspicious patternsExamine the device logs via 'xstatus' or the web interface Logs section. Look for unusual HTTP requests, particularly those containing '../' path traversal sequences or unusual file access patternsAffected if Logs show anomalous requests with path traversal characters or unauthorized access to sensitive directories
Your device is affected if it is running Cisco TelePresence CE version below 10.19.1, or any version of Cisco RoomOS, and the management interface is network-accessible to potential attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.19.1
Apply the vendor-supplied patches for affected Cisco TelePresence CE and RoomOS software versions; if patching is not immediately possible, restrict network access to management interfaces and implement network segmentation to reduce exposure.
Cisco TelePresence Collaboration Endpoint CE software version 10.19.1 or later
- 1. Backup the current device configuration before initiating any upgrade
- 2. Download Cisco TelePresence Collaboration Endpoint software version 10.19.1 or later from the Cisco Software Download Center
- 3. Access the device administration interface (web UI or CLI)
- 4. Navigate to the software upgrade section
- 5. Upload and install the version 10.19.1 or later firmware
- 6. Verify the upgrade completed successfully and the device is functioning normally
- 7. Confirm the new version is running: System > Product Info in web UI or 'show version' in CLI
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20953 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20953 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data