CVE-2022-21177
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThere is a path traversal vulnerability in CAMS for HIS Log Server contained in the following Yokogawa Electric products: CENTUM CS 3000 versions from R3.08.10 to R3.09.00, CENTUM VP versions from R4.01.00 to R4.03.00, from R5.01.00 to R5.04.20, andfrom R6.01.00 to R6.08.00, Exaopc versions from R3.72.00 to R3.79.00.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA path traversal vulnerability exists in the CAMS for HIS Log Server component of Yokogawa's CENTUM CS 3000, CENTUM VP, and Exaopc products. The vulnerability allows attackers to manipulate file path inputs using '..' sequences to access files outside the intended directory boundaries, potentially leading to unauthorized file access or disclosure of sensitive system files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= r3.08.10, <= r3.09.00>= r3.08.10, <= r3.09.00>= r4.01.00, <= r4.03.00>= r5.01.00, <= r5.04.20>= r6.01.00, < r6.09.00>= r4.01.00, <= r4.03.00>= r5.01.00, <= r5.04.20>= r6.01.00, < r6.09.00>= r3.72.00, < r3.80.00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Yokogawa productLocate and check the installed Yokogawa product: CENTUM CS 3000, CENTUM VP, or Exaopc. Consult the system inventory or check the product information via the control system management interface.Affected if The product is one of the three affected: CENTUM CS 3000, CENTUM VP, or Exaopc.
-
Determine firmware versionCheck the firmware version of the installed Yokogawa product. For CENTUM CS 3000, look for versions between r3.08.10 and r3.09.00 inclusive. For CENTUM VP, look for versions r4.01.00-r4.03.00, r5.01.00-r5.04.20, or r6.01.00 up to but not including r6.09.00. For Exaopc, look for versions r3.72.00 up to but not including r3.80.00.Affected if The installed firmware version falls within any of the affected version ranges.
-
Confirm CAMS for HIS Log Server componentVerify whether the CAMS for HIS Log Server component is installed and running on the system. Check the component list or running services related to CAMS (Computer-Aided Manufacturing System) and HIS (Human Interface Station) Log Server.Affected if The CAMS for HIS Log Server component is present and active on the system.
-
Review access controls on log serverExamine the configuration and permissions of the CAMS for HIS Log Server to determine if it allows file path inputs. Check for any publicly accessible endpoints or interfaces that accept file path parameters.Affected if The log server component accepts user-supplied file path inputs without proper validation.
The environment is affected if a Yokogawa CENTUM CS 3000, CENTUM VP, or Exaopc product with a firmware version in the listed ranges has the CAMS for HIS Log Server component installed and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-provided patches or updates when available. If no patch exists, implement input validation and filtering for path traversal sequences, and restrict the application process permissions to minimize file system exposure.
CENTUM VP: R6.09.00 or later; Exaopc: R3.80.00 or later; CENTUM CS 3000: Contact Yokogawa for specific patched version
- 1. Identify the specific Yokogawa product and current firmware version in use (CENTUM CS 3000, CENTUM VP, or Exaopc)
- 2. For CENTUM VP: Upgrade firmware to version R6.09.00 or later
- 3. For Exaopc: Upgrade to version R3.80.00 or later
- 4. For CENTUM CS 3000: Contact Yokogawa directly for patched firmware version as the affected range R3.08.10-R3.09.00 may have limited support
- 5. After upgrade, verify the CAMS for HIS Log Server path traversal vulnerability is resolved by reviewing release notes or consulting Yokogawa documentation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-21177 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-21177 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data