CVE-2022-21320
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability in the MySQL Cluster product of Oracle MySQL (component: Cluster: General). Supported versions that are affected are 8.0.27 and prior. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with access to the physical communication segment attached to the hardware where the MySQL Cluster executes to compromise MySQL Cluster. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of MySQL Cluster. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.3 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a vulnerability in MySQL Cluster (component: Cluster: General) affecting versions 8.0.27 and prior. It allows a high-privileged attacker with physical access to the network segment attached to the MySQL Cluster hardware to potentially takeover the cluster. Exploitation is difficult and requires human interaction from a person other than the attacker.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0, <= 8.0.27all versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed MySQL Server versionRun `mysql --version` or connect to MySQL and execute `SELECT VERSION();` to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if Version is 8.0.27 or earlier (8.0.0 through 8.0.27 inclusive)
-
Verify MySQL Cluster component is in useCheck if the NDB cluster engine is enabled: run `SHOW ENGINES;` and look for 'ndbcluster' with 'YES' status, or check for ndbd/ndbmtd processes with `ps aux | grep ndb`Affected if NDB cluster engine (ndbcluster) is installed and active, indicating MySQL Cluster is configured
-
Confirm MySQL Cluster specific versionIf Cluster is in use, query `SELECT @@ndb_version_string;` or `SELECT @@version_comment;` to confirm the NDB cluster version componentAffected if The NDB cluster version component matches the vulnerable 8.0.x range through 8.0.27
-
Check for NetApp Oncommand Insight installationOn the affected system, query installed packages or check for Oncommand Insight binaries (commonly in /opt/netapp or Program Files/NetApp)Affected if Netapp Oncommand Insight is installed, regardless of version (all versions affected)
-
Check for NetApp Oncommand Workflow Automation installationOn the affected system, query installed packages or check for Oncommand Workflow Automation binariesAffected if Netapp Oncommand Workflow Automation is installed, regardless of version (all versions affected)
You are affected if you run MySQL Cluster version 8.0.0 through 8.0.27, or if you have NetApp Oncommand Insight or NetApp Oncommand Workflow Automation installed, AND an attacker could gain physical access to the cluster's network segment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade MySQL Cluster to a patched version (8.0.28 or later). In the meantime, ensure strong physical security of the data center and network segmentation to limit access to the physical communication segment.
MySQL Cluster 8.0.28 or later (or latest 8.0.x stable release)
- Identify the exact MySQL Cluster version currently installed using: SELECT VERSION();
- Review the Oncommand Insight and Oncommand Workflow Automation documentation to confirm they embed MySQL and are therefore affected
- For MySQL Cluster: Plan upgrade to MySQL Cluster 8.0.28 or later (the next release after 8.0.27 which contains the fix)
- For NetApp products: Check security.netapp.com for specific patch advisories for Oncommand Insight and Oncommand Workflow Automation
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment before deploying to production
- Schedule a maintenance window and perform the upgrade
- After upgrade, verify the MySQL Cluster is operational and test application functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-21320 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-21320 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data