CVE-2022-21369
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Rich Text Editor). Supported versions that are affected are 8.57, 8.58 and 8.59. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Rich Text Editor component of Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools versions 8.57, 8.58, and 8.59. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this through HTTP requests, requiring human interaction (such as clicking a malicious link), allowing unauthorized read and limited write access to application data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.57= 8.58= 8.59CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed PeopleTools versionAccess PeopleSoft Application Designer or use the following SQL query against the database: SELECT version FROM psoptions. Alternatively, check the About PeopleSoft page in the PIA (PeopleSoft Internet Architecture) or examine the PS_HOME directory for version files.Affected if The installed version matches 8.57, 8.58, or 8.59 exactly.
-
Confirm the Rich Text Editor component is accessibleAccess the PeopleSoft Pure Internet Architecture portal and navigate to any page that utilizes the Rich Text Editor, such as the Message Catalog or Notification configurations. The component is typically accessed via the Rich Text Editor field type in Application Designer or through web-based forms.Affected if The Rich Text Editor interface loads and accepts user input without additional authentication beyond portal login.
-
Check for unauthenticated access to Rich Text Editor endpointsExamine the PeopleSoft web configuration files (webservic.xml, webprofile configuration) and the PeopleSoft Interaction Hub settings. Verify whether the Rich Text Editor servlet endpoints (such as /psc/ps/EMPLOYEE/HRMS/c/PT_NEWS_FEED.RichTextEditor.*) are exposed to unauthenticated users.Affected if The Rich Text Editor servlet or its endpoints are accessible without requiring full PeopleSoft authentication.
-
Review PeopleSoft web configuration for XSS filter settingsExamine the PeopleSoft web profile configuration (webprofile.properties or via PIA administration) for the RSS_RENDER_XSS filter settings and input validation configurations. Check whether Oracle's Security Technical Implementation Guide (STIG) recommendations have been applied.Affected if XSS filtering is disabled or the web profile lacks proper input validation controls for the Rich Text Editor.
The environment is affected if the installed PeopleTools version is exactly 8.57, 8.58, or 8.59 AND the Rich Text Editor component is enabled and accessible to users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant Oracle security patch for PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider disabling or restricting access to the Rich Text Editor component and implementing input validation/sanitization as a compensating control.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-21369 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-21369 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data