CVE-2022-21387
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability in the Oracle Commerce Platform product of Oracle Commerce (component: Dynamo Application Framework). Supported versions that are affected are 11.3.0, 11.3.1 and 11.3.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Commerce Platform. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Commerce Platform accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOracle Commerce Platform's Dynamo Application Framework contains an information disclosure vulnerability allowing unauthenticated attackers with network access via HTTP to read a subset of accessible data. The flaw affects versions 11.3.0, 11.3.1, and 11.3.2, with CVSS 3.1 scoring 5.3 indicating low confidentiality impact without integrity or availability compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.3.0= 11.3.1= 11.3.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Oracle Commerce Platform installationSearch for Oracle Commerce Platform components in your environment. Check application server configurations (WebLogic, etc.) for Oracle Commerce deployments. Look for directories or services named 'atg' or 'dynamo' which are typical Oracle Commerce markers.Affected if Oracle Commerce Platform is installed and running on the system
-
Determine the installed version of Oracle Commerce PlatformCheck the version file or deployment descriptor within the Oracle Commerce installation directory. Common locations include version.properties, manifest files, or the root directory of the Commerce deployment. Compare the found version against 11.3.0, 11.3.1, or 11.3.2.Affected if The installed version matches exactly 11.3.0, 11.3.1, or 11.3.2
-
Verify Dynamo Application Framework is accessibleConfirm the Dynamo Application Framework endpoints are exposed and reachable via HTTP. Check if the /dyn/ or similar Dynamo-related URL paths are accessible on the application server. Review servlet and filter configurations in the web.xml deployment descriptor.Affected if The Dynamo Application Framework is enabled and exposed via HTTP network access
-
Assess network exposureDetermine if the Oracle Commerce application is accessible over the network via HTTP/HTTPS from untrusted sources. Review firewall rules, load balancer configurations, and network ACLs that permit inbound HTTP traffic to the Commerce Platform ports.Affected if The application is accessible via HTTP from untrusted network locations without proper access controls
A system is affected if it runs Oracle Commerce Platform versions 11.3.0, 11.3.1, or 11.3.2 with the Dynamo Application Framework exposed to network access, allowing unauthenticated HTTP requests to potentially read accessible data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant Oracle Critical Patch Update (CPU) for CVE-2022-21387 or upgrade to a patched version of Oracle Commerce Platform. If immediate patching is not feasible, implement a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to filter malicious HTTP requests targeting the Dynamo Application Framework.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-21387 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-21387 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data