CVE-2022-21944
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following vulnerability in the systemd service file for watchman of openSUSE Backports SLE-15-SP3, Factory allows local attackers to escalate to root. This issue affects: openSUSE Backports SLE-15-SP3 watchman versions prior to 4.9.0. openSUSE Factory watchman versions prior to 4.9.0-9.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA symlink following vulnerability in the systemd service file for watchman allows local attackers to gain root privileges by exploiting improper symlink handling in the service configuration. The flaw enables a local user to manipulate symlinks to escalate to root access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.9.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify watchman is installedRun 'rpm -qa | grep watchman' (OpenSUSE) or check for the watchman binary at /usr/bin/watchman or /usr/local/bin/watchmanAffected if watchman package or binary is present on the system
-
Determine installed watchman versionRun 'watchman --version' or 'rpm -q watchman --queryformat "%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}"' to get the exact version numberAffected if Version is 4.9.1 or lower, or for SLE-15-SP3 versions below 4.9.0, or Factory versions below 4.9.0-9.1
-
Locate the systemd service fileRun 'systemctl show watchman.service' or find the service file at /etc/systemd/system/watchman.service or /usr/lib/systemd/system/watchman.serviceAffected if A watchman.service file exists and is writable by non-root users
-
Check service file permissions and symlinksRun 'ls -la /etc/systemd/system/watchman.service' and 'ls -la /usr/lib/systemd/system/watchman.service' to inspect ownership and permissions; check for symlinks with 'readlink -f <path>'Affected if The service file or its parent directory is writable by a local attacker or contains symlinks pointing to attacker-controlled locations
-
Inspect service file content for unsafe pathsRun 'cat /etc/systemd/system/watchman.service' (or the active service path) and check for ExecStart, WorkingDirectory, or PIDFile paths that may be exploitable symlinksAffected if The service configuration references paths in writable directories (e.g., /tmp, /var/tmp, or world-writable directories)
-
Verify process ownership and privilegesRun 'systemctl show watchman' and check the User= and Group= settings in the service file to confirm if watchman runs as rootAffected if Watchman service runs as root (User=root) and the service file or related paths have weak permissions
A system is affected if watchman is installed with version 4.9.1 or lower on OpenSUSE Factory, runs as root, and the systemd service file or its associated directories have insecure permissions allowing symlink manipulation by local users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade watchman to version 4.9.0 or later (SLE-15-SP3) or version 4.9.0-9.1 or later (Factory) to resolve the symlink following issue. Alternatively, audit and secure the systemd service file permissions and paths.
watchman >= 4.9.0 (Backports SLE-15-SP3) or watchman >= 4.9.0-9.1 (Factory)
- Identify the current installed version of watchman using: zypper info watchman or rpm -qi watchman
- For openSUSE Backports SLE-15-SP3: Upgrade watchman to version 4.9.0 or later using: zypper update watchman or zypper in watchman>=4.9.0
- For openSUSE Factory: Upgrade watchman to version 4.9.0-9.1 or later using: zypper update watchman or zypper in watchman>=4.9.0-9.1
- Verify the installation of the fixed version: rpm -qi watchman
- Restart the watchman service if running: systemctl restart watchman
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-21944 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-21944 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data