CVE-2022-22063
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMemory corruption in Core due to improper configuration in boot remapper.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in the Core component stemming from improper configuration of the boot remapper. The boot remapper appears to mishandle memory mapping during the boot process, leading to memory corruption that could potentially allow privilege escalation or code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chip model in your deviceCheck device documentation, system information, or use commands like 'lspci', 'lsusb', or check /proc/cpuinfo for hardware identifiers. Look for model numbers: Apq8096au, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Qca6174, Qca6174a, Qca6574a, Qca6574au, or Wcn3990.Affected if The device uses any of the listed Qualcomm chip models (Apq8096au, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Qca6174, Qca6174a, Qca6574a, Qca6574au, Wcn3990)
-
Check the firmware versionRetrieve the firmware version from the device. This may require accessing boot logs, firmware management interfaces, or vendor-specific tools. For example, check dmesg for firmware loading messages, or use vendor-provided firmware version queries.Affected if The device is running firmware from any of the affected product lines (all versions of the listed Qualcomm firmware products are affected)
-
Verify boot remapper configurationExamine boot configuration files, boot logs, or memory mapping settings. Check if custom or non-standard boot remapper configurations are in place. Look for boot parameters related to memory mapping in bootloader configurations (e.g., UEFI settings, boot.ini, or vendor-specific boot loaders).Affected if A custom or non-standard boot remapper configuration is present that could trigger the memory mapping mishandling during boot
-
Check for evidence of memory corruptionReview system logs (dmesg, boot logs, kernel logs) for signs of memory corruption, boot failures, or unexpected memory access errors occurring during or shortly after boot. Look for error patterns like 'memory corruption', 'invalid memory map', or 'boot remap' related errors.Affected if Memory corruption errors or abnormal boot-time memory mapping errors are present in logs
If your device uses any of the affected Qualcomm firmware products (Apq8096au, Mdm9640, Mdm9645, Qca6174, Qca6174a, Qca6574a, Qca6574au, Wcn3990), you are affected since all versions of these products contain the vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply relevant security patches from Microsoft; ensure boot configuration integrity and verify secure boot settings are properly implemented.
Obtain the fixed firmware release from Qualcomm through your device OEM; specific version numbers are available in Qualcomm's security advisory
- Contact your device manufacturer (OEM) to request the CVE-2022-22063 firmware update for your specific device model
- Verify with Qualcomm's official security advisory on www.qualcomm.com for the fixed firmware version applicable to your chipset
- Apply the OEM-provided firmware update through the device's standard update mechanism
- After updating, verify the patch level matches the version specified in Qualcomm's security bulletin
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22063 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22063 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data