CVE-2022-22103
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMemory corruption in multimedia driver due to double free while processing data from user in Snapdragon Auto
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA double-free vulnerability exists in the Snapdragon Auto multimedia driver where processing user-supplied data causes the same memory location to be freed twice. This heap corruption can lead to arbitrary code execution or denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Snapdragon processor modelInspect the system hardware inventory or processor identification to determine if the system uses a Sa8540p or Sa9000p Snapdragon Auto processorAffected if The system contains a Sa8540p or Sa9000p processor
-
Locate firmware version informationQuery the system firmware or boot logs for the installed Qualcomm Snapdragon Auto firmware version stringAffected if The firmware version cannot be verified as patched or is earlier than vendor release of fix
-
Verify multimedia driver presenceCheck system driver/module listings for the Snapdragon Auto multimedia driver component that processes user-supplied dataAffected if The multimedia driver is loaded and handles user data processing
-
Confirm driver version against vendor releaseCompare the installed driver/firmware version to the vendor advisory for CVE-2022-22103 to determine if the fix has been appliedAffected if The driver version predates or lacks the CVE-2022-22103 security fix
The environment is affected if the system runs a Sa8540p or Sa9000p Snapdragon Auto processor with unpatched firmware that contains the vulnerable multimedia driver handling user data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied firmware/patch from Qualcomm for Snapdragon Auto processors. Review driver memory management code for proper free() handling and validate all user data processing paths.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22103 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22103 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data