CVE-2022-22152
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability in the REST API of Juniper Networks Contrail Service Orchestration allows one tenant on the system to view confidential configuration details of another tenant on the same system. By utilizing the REST API, one tenant is able to obtain information on another tenant's firewall configuration and access control policies, as well as other sensitive information, exposing the tenant to reduced defense against malicious attacks or exploitation via additional undetermined vulnerabilities. This issue affects Juniper Networks Contrail Service Orchestration versions prior to 6.1.0 Patch 3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA tenant isolation failure in the Contrail Service Orchestration REST API allows authenticated tenants to access another tenant's confidential configuration data, including firewall rules and access control policies, due to improper authorization checks in multi-tenant API endpoints.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 6.0.0= 6.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Contrail Service Orchestration installation and versionIdentify the installed version of Juniper Contrail Service Orchestration in your environment. This is typically available via the product's admin interface, CLI tools, or package management system. Common methods include checking the contrail-version command output or reviewing installed package versions.Affected if The installed version is 6.1.0 or any version <= 6.0.0 (versions 6.1.0 and below are affected)
-
Verify multi-tenant API endpoint exposureDetermine whether the Contrail Service Orchestration REST API is accessible and whether multi-tenant API endpoints are enabled. Check the API service configuration and network accessibility of the REST API ports.Affected if Multi-tenant API endpoints are exposed and accessible to tenant users
-
Check authorization configuration for tenant isolationReview the authorization and access control configuration for the multi-tenant API endpoints. Look for settings that control cross-tenant access to configuration data such as firewall rules and access control policies.Affected if Authorization controls allow authenticated tenants to access resources belonging to other tenants, or no explicit tenant isolation checks are configured
-
Inspect API access logs for cross-tenant patternsExamine API access logs for any instances where tenant users accessed configuration data belonging to other tenants. Look for API calls that retrieve firewall rules or access control policies from different tenant contexts.Affected if Logs show cross-tenant data access attempts or successful retrievals of another tenant's configuration data
You are affected if Contrail Service Orchestration version 6.1.0 or lower is installed AND multi-tenant API endpoints are accessible, allowing unauthorized cross-tenant access to configuration data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Juniper Contrail Service Orchestration 6.1.0 Patch 3 or later. As a compensating control, implement strict network segmentation and monitor API access logs for cross-tenant data access patterns.
6.1.0 Patch 3 or later
- 1. Back up the current Contrail Service Orchestration configuration and database
- 2. Download Contrail Service Orchestration version 6.1.0 Patch 3 (or a later patched release) from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 3. Follow the standard Contrail Service Orchestration upgrade procedure as documented in the Juniper Networks administrator guide
- 4. After upgrade, verify that the REST API correctly enforces tenant isolation by confirming tenants cannot access other tenants' configurations
- 5. Validate that all services are functioning correctly post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22152 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22152 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data