CVE-2022-22155
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in the handling of IPv6 neighbor state change events in Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an adjacent attacker to cause a memory leak in the Flexible PIC Concentrator (FPC) of an ACX5448 router. The continuous flapping of an IPv6 neighbor with specific timing will cause the FPC to run out of resources, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. Once the condition occurs, further packet processing will be impacted, creating a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition, requiring a manual PFE restart to restore service. The following error messages will be seen after the FPC resources have been exhausted: fpc0 DNX_NH::dnx_nh_tag_ipv4_hw_install(),3135: dnx_nh_tag_ipv4_hw_install: BCM L3 Egress create object failed for NH 602 (-14:No resources for operation), BCM NH Params: unit:0 Port:41, L3_INTF:0 Flags: 0x40 fpc0 DNX_NH::dnx_nh_tag_ipv4_hw_install(),3135: dnx_nh_tag_ipv4_hw_install: BCM L3 Egress create object failed for NH 602 (-14:No resources for operation), BCM NH Params: unit:0 Port:41, L3_INTF:0 Flags: 0x40 fpc0 DNX_NH::dnx_nh_tag_ipv4_hw_install(),3135: dnx_nh_tag_ipv4_hw_install: BCM L3 Egress create object failed for NH 602 (-14:No resources for operation), BCM NH Params: unit:0 Port:41, L3_INTF:0 Flags: 0x40 fpc0 DNX_NH::dnx_nh_tag_ipv4_hw_install(),3135: dnx_nh_tag_ipv4_hw_install: BCM L3 Egress create object failed for NH 602 (-14:No resources for operation), BCM NH Params: unit:0 Port:41, L3_INTF:0 Flags: 0x40 This issue only affects the ACX5448 router. No other products or platforms are affected by this vulnerability. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on ACX5448: 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R3-S10; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R3-S5; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S8, 19.2R3-S2; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S6, 19.3R3-S2; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R1-S3, 19.4R2-S2, 19.4R3; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R1-S1, 20.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in Junos OS ACX5448 routers allows an adjacent attacker to cause a memory leak in the Flexible PIC Concentrator (FPC) by continuously flapping IPv6 neighbor state with specific timing. This exhausts FPC resources, causing BCM L3 Egress object creation failures and preventing further packet processing, resulting in a sustained DoS condition requiring manual PFE restart.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 18.4= 19.1= 19.2= 19.3= 19.4= 20.1= 20.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is ACX5448Run 'show chassis hardware' or 'show system information' and verify the model number in the output is ACX5448Affected if Device is not an ACX5448 router - this vulnerability only affects ACX5448 platforms
-
Check installed Junos OS versionRun 'show version' and note the exact Junos version (e.g., 18.4R1-S1, 19.2R3, etc.)Affected if Version matches or falls within these ranges: 18.4 (any release), 19.1 (any release), 19.2 (any release), 19.3 (any release), 19.4 (any release), 20.1 (any release), 20.2 (any release)
-
Verify IPv6 is enabled on the deviceRun 'show ipv6 neighbors' or check interface configuration with 'show configuration protocols ipv6'Affected if IPv6 is enabled and active - the exploit requires IPv6 neighbor state manipulation to trigger the memory leak
-
Monitor for BCM L3 Egress object errorsRun 'show log messages' and search for 'BCM L3 Egress' or 'object creation failed' error messagesAffected if Error messages indicate BCM L3 Egress object creation failures, suggesting the memory leak has been triggered
-
Check FPC resource statusRun 'show chassis fpc' or 'show pfe statistics traffic' to inspect FPC memory and packet processing statisticsAffected if FPC shows high memory usage, resource exhaustion, or failure to process packets indicating the DoS condition is active
Device is affected if it is an ACX5448 router running any Junos OS version in the 18.4 through 20.2 range with IPv6 enabled, and either error messages or FPC resource exhaustion are observed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the relevant Junos OS software update (18.4R3-S10, 19.1R3-S5, 19.2R1-S8/19.2R3-S2, 19.3R2-S6/19.3R3-S2, 19.4R1-S3/19.4R2-S2/19.4R3, 20.1R2, or 20.2R1-S1/20.2R2 or later) to the ACX5448. If patching is not immediately possible, monitor for the error messages and plan for maintenance window to restart PFE if DoS occurs.
Minimum fixed versions: 18.4R3-S10, 19.1R3-S5, 19.2R3-S2 (or 19.2R1-S8), 19.3R3-S2 (or 19.3R2-S6), 19.4R3 (or 19.4R2-S2/19.4R1-S3), 20.1R2, or 20.2R2 (or 20.2R1-S1)
- Confirm the current Junos OS version on the ACX5448 router using 'show version'
- Identify the appropriate upgrade path based on the current version (18.4, 19.1, 19.2, 19.3, 19.4, 20.1, or 20.2)
- Download the corresponding fixed Junos OS release from the Juniper Networks support portal
- Plan maintenance window as upgrade will require system reboot
- Upload the new Junos OS image to the router's /var/tmp directory
- Execute 'request system software add /var/tmp/<image-name>' to install the new version
- After installation completes, reboot the device with 'request system reboot'
- Verify the upgrade was successful and the device is operational
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22155 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22155 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data