CVE-2022-22170
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated networked attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending specific packets over VXLAN which cause heap memory to leak and on exhaustion the PFE to reset. The heap memory utilization can be monitored with the command: user@host> show chassis fpc This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S6, 19.4R3-S6; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S1; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R2. This issue does not affect versions of Junos OS prior to 19.4R1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated attacker to cause heap memory leak by sending specific VXLAN packets, which eventually exhausts memory and triggers a PFE reset resulting in Denial of Service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 19.4= 20.1= 20.2= 20.3= 20.4= 21.1= 21.2= 21.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' to identify the installed Junos OS versionAffected if Version matches 19.4, 20.1, 20.2, 20.3, 20.4, 21.1, 21.2, or 21.3 from the affected versions list
-
Confirm VXLAN is configuredRun 'show configuration protocols vxlan' or search for VXLAN-related configuration using 'show configuration | match vxlan'Affected if VXLAN protocol is actively configured on the device
-
Check PFE heap memory usageRun 'show chassis fpc' and examine the heap utilization percentages for each PFE, or use 'show system memory' to monitor memory consumptionAffected if Heap memory shows abnormal growth or high utilization percentages that do not return to baseline
-
Look for PFE reset eventsRun 'show chassis fpc' to check for any FPC or PFE that shows offline status or recent restarts, and review system logs with 'show log messages | last 100' for PFE reset entriesAffected if Any PFE or FPC has been reset or shows unexpected offline status without manual intervention
A device is likely affected if it runs an affected Junos OS version (19.4 through 21.3), has VXLAN configured, and shows abnormal heap memory growth or PFE resets when receiving VXLAN traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patches for affected Junos OS versions (19.4R2-S6+, 20.1R3-S2+, 20.2R3-S3+, 20.3R3-S1+, 20.4R3+, 21.1R3+, 21.2R2+); monitor heap utilization using 'show chassis fpc' command as a temporary detection measure.
Upgrade to the minimum fixed release for your version branch: 19.4R3-S6, 20.1R3-S2, 20.2R3-S3, or 20.3R3-S1 (or later versions such as 20.4R3, 21.1R3, 21.2R2)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the device using: show version
- 2. Determine which version branch (19.4, 20.1, 20.2, or 20.3) the device is running
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed version from the Juniper Networks support portal: 19.4R3-S6 or later, 20.1R3-S2 or later, 20.2R3-S3 or later, or 20.3R3-S1 or later
- 4. Upload the Junos OS upgrade package to the device
- 5. Install the upgrade using: request system software add <package-name> reboot
- 6. After reboot, verify the fix by confirming the new version is installed: show version
- 7. Monitor heap memory utilization using: show chassis fpc to confirm the memory leak is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22170 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22170 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data