CVE-2022-22171
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated networked attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending specific packets over VXLAN which cause the PFE to reset. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S7; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S3; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S2; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S1; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R2; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R1-S1, 21.3R2. This issue does not affect versions of Junos OS prior to 19.4R1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn improper check for unusual or exceptional conditions in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated network attacker to cause denial of service by sending specific packets over VXLAN that trigger a PFE reset.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 19.4= 20.1= 20.2= 20.3= 20.4= 21.1= 21.2= 21.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' command on the device and note the installed Junos versionAffected if The installed version matches 19.4, 20.1, 20.2, 20.3, 20.4, 21.1, 21.2, or 21.3 (any release within these version lines)
-
Verify VXLAN configurationRun 'show configuration | display set | match vxlan' to see if VXLAN features or tunnels are configuredAffected if VXLAN is configured and active on the device
-
Check for VXLAN-enabled interfacesRun 'show interfaces vxlan' to list all VXLAN tunnel interfaces and their statusAffected if Any VXLAN tunnel interfaces are in 'up' state
-
Identify VXLAN routing instancesRun 'show configuration routing-instances | display set | match vxlan' to find VXLAN-based routing instancesAffected if VXLAN routing instances are configured with VXLAN encapsulation
The device is affected if it runs any of the listed vulnerable Junos versions AND has VXLAN functionality configured or enabled, as the vulnerability is triggered by specific VXLAN packets.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Junos OS to the patched versions specified (19.4R3-S7, 20.1R3-S3, 20.2R3-S3, 20.3R3-S2, 20.4R3-S1, 21.1R3, 21.2R2, or 21.3R2+) to remediate this vulnerability.
Upgrade to 19.4R3-S7 (for 19.4 branch), 20.1R3-S3 (for 20.1 branch), 20.2R3-S3 (for 20.2 branch), or 20.3R3-S2 (for 20.3 branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the device using 'show version'
- 2. Determine which affected branch (19.4, 20.1, 20.2, or 20.3) the current version belongs to
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed version from Juniper Networks: for 19.4 branch upgrade to 19.4R3-S7, for 20.1 branch upgrade to 20.1R3-S3, for 20.2 branch upgrade to 20.2R3-S3, for 20.3 branch upgrade to 20.3R3-S2
- 4. Upload the Junos OS upgrade package to the device
- 5. Initiate the upgrade using 'request system software add <package>' with the appropriate options (e.g., no-validate, reboot)
- 6. After upgrade completes, verify the new version is running with 'show version'
- 7. Confirm VXLAN functionality is operational and PFE is stable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22171 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22171 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data