CVE-2022-22175
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Locking vulnerability in the SIP ALG of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series and SRX Series allows an unauthenticated networked attacker to cause a flowprocessing daemon (flowd) crash and thereby a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt of these specific packets will cause a sustained Denial of Service condition. This issue can occur in a scenario where the SIP ALG is enabled and specific SIP messages are being processed simultaneously. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series and SRX Series 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S1; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R2-S2, 21.1R3; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R1-S2, 21.2R2; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R1-S1, 21.3R2. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS versions prior to 20.4R1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn improper locking vulnerability in the SIP ALG (Application Layer Gateway) on Juniper Networks Junos OS for MX Series and SRX Series allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the flowd (flow processing daemon) by sending specific SIP messages while the SIP ALG is enabled and processing simultaneous SIP messages, resulting in sustained DoS.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 20.4= 21.1= 21.2= 21.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show system information' to confirm the device is an MX Series or SRX Series routerAffected if Device is not MX Series or SRX Series (vulnerability only affects these platforms)
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' to obtain the installed Junos OS versionAffected if Version matches 20.4, 21.1, 21.2, or 21.3 release trains (e.g., 20.4R1, 21.1R1, etc.)
-
Verify SIP ALG is enabledRun 'show security alg sip' to check if the SIP ALG is active, or inspect configuration with 'show security alg' and look for 'sip' under the ALG settingsAffected if SIP ALG is enabled (vulnerability only triggers when SIP ALG processes SIP traffic)
-
Check flowd daemon statusRun 'show system processes extensive | match flowd' to check if the flowd process is running, or look for recent core dumps with 'show system core-dumps'Affected if Flowd process is absent, crashed, or core dumps exist (indicates the vulnerability may have been triggered)
Device is affected if it is an MX/SRX Series running Junos 20.4/21.1/21.2/21.3 with SIP ALG enabled and flowd has crashed or is unstable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDisable the SIP ALG if not required, or upgrade Junos OS to the patched version (20.4R3-S1, 21.1R2-S2/21.1R3, 21.2R1-S2/21.2R2, or 21.3R1-S1/21.3R2 depending on the release train).
20.4R3-S1, 21.1R2-S2/21.1R3, 21.2R1-S2/21.2R2, or 21.3R1-S1/21.3R2 (depending on starting branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version on the affected MX Series or SRX Series device using 'show version'
- 2. Verify SIP ALG is enabled by checking the configuration with 'show configuration security alg sip'
- 3. If SIP ALG is enabled and the device is on an affected version (20.4, 21.1, 21.2, or 21.3), plan for upgrade to a fixed release
- 4. For 20.4 branch: upgrade to 20.4R3-S1 or later
- 5. For 21.1 branch: upgrade to 21.1R2-S2 or 21.1R3 or later
- 6. For 21.2 branch: upgrade to 21.2R1-S2 or 21.2R2 or later
- 7. For 21.3 branch: upgrade to 21.3R1-S1 or 21.3R2 or later
- 8. Download the appropriate upgrade package from the Juniper Networks support portal
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22175 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22175 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data