CVE-2022-22179
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in Input vulnerability in the Juniper DHCP daemon (jdhcpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an adjacent unauthenticated attacker to cause a crash of jdhcpd and thereby a Denial of Service (DoS). In a scenario where DHCP relay or local server is configured the problem can be triggered if a DHCPv4 packet with specific options is received leading to a corruption of the options read from the packet. This corruption can then lead to jdhcpd crash and restart. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 17.4R1 and later versions prior to 18.4R3-S10; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R3-S7; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S8, 19.2R3-S4; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S4; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R3-S6; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S2; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S1; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R2-S2, 21.1R3; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R1-S2, 21.2R2, 21.2R3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R1-S1, 21.3R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS DHCP daemon (jdhcpd) allows an adjacent unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service by sending specially crafted DHCPv4 packets with specific options. The improper validation of specified index/offset in input leads to corruption of packet options read, causing jdhcpd to crash and restart.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 17.4= 18.1= 18.2= 18.3= 18.4= 19.1= 19.2= 19.3= 19.4= 20.1= 20.2= 20.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' on the device and note the exact software version stringAffected if The installed version matches one of these: 17.4, 18.1, 18.2, 18.3, 18.4, 19.1, 19.2, 19.3, 19.4, 20.1, 20.2, or 20.3
-
Verify DHCP relay or server is configuredRun 'show configuration | display json | match dhcp' or review the configuration for dhcp-relay or dhcp-server sections under [edit services]Affected if DHCP relay or DHCP server services are configured and active on the device
-
Confirm jdhcpd process is runningRun 'show system processes | match jdhcpd' or check process status via 'request system process daemon jdhcpd'Affected if The jdhcpd daemon process is actively running on the device
-
Check DHCP service restart historyRun 'show system processes restart-history' or review system logs for jdhcpd crash events using 'show log messages | match jdhcpd'Affected if There are recent unexpected jdhcpd restarts or crash indications in logs
A device is affected if it runs a matching Junos version (17.4 through 20.3) AND has DHCP relay or server functionality enabled, exposing the jdhcpd daemon to specially crafted DHCPv4 packets from an adjacent attacker.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the appropriate Junos OS security update from Juniper Networks that addresses this vulnerability in the jdhcpd component. Until patched, monitor DHCP relay/server functionality for unexpected restarts.
Upgrade to Junos OS 21.3R2 or later (or the latest available release). For branch-specific fixes: 18.4R3-S10, 19.1R3-S7, 19.2R3-S4, 19.3R3-S4, 19.4R3-S6, 20.1R3-S2, 20.2R3-S3, 20.3R3-S2, or 20.4R3-S1.
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the device using 'show version'
- 2. Review the DHCP relay or DHCP server configuration using 'show configuration | display set | match dhcp'
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS release from the Juniper Networks website (21.3R2 or later, or the equivalent fixed release for your branch: 18.4R3-S10, 19.1R3-S7, 19.2R3-S4, 19.3R3-S4, 19.4R3-S6, 20.1R3-S2, 20.2R3-S3, 20.3R3-S2, or 20.4R3-S1)
- 4. Upload the Junos OS upgrade package to the device via FTP/SCP to /var/tmp/
- 5. Initiate the software install using 'request system software add /var/tmp/<package-name>'
- 6. Reboot the device using 'request system reboot'
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version is installed using 'show version'
- 8. Verify DHCP service is operational using 'show dhcp server binding' or 'show dhcp relay statistics'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22179 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22179 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data