CVE-2022-22196
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an adjacent, unauthenticated attacker with an established ISIS adjacency to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). The rpd CPU spikes to 100% after a malformed ISIS TLV has been received which will lead to processing issues of routing updates and in turn traffic impact. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R3-S4; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R2-S6, 19.4R3-S6; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R3-S2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S1; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R2. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved All versions prior to 20.4R3-S3-EVO; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R2-EVO. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS versions prior to 19.3R1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA malformed ISIS TLV triggers an improper check for unusual conditions in the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved. When an adjacent, unauthenticated attacker with an established ISIS adjacency sends this crafted packet, the rpd process consumes 100% CPU, preventing routing update processing and causing traffic disruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 19.3= 19.4= 20.1= 20.2= 20.3= 20.4= 21.1= 21.2< 20.4= 20.4= 21.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'request system version' to obtain the installed Junos OS versionAffected if The version matches 19.3, 19.4, 20.1, 20.2, 20.3, 20.4, 21.1, or 21.2 (for Junos) or is below 20.4, equals 20.4, or equals 21.2 (for Junos OS Evolved)
-
Verify ISIS protocol is enabledRun 'show protocol isis' or check the configuration with 'show configuration protocols isis'Affected if ISIS protocol is configured and enabled on the device, exposing the attack surface
-
List active ISIS adjacenciesRun 'show isis adjacency' to see all established ISIS neighborsAffected if There are active ISIS adjacencies, particularly from untrusted or unexpected neighbors
-
Check rpd process CPU usageRun 'show system processes rpd' or 'monitor system processes rpd' to observe CPU consumptionAffected if The rpd process is consuming 100% CPU or showing abnormally high CPU usage
-
Review ISIS interface configurationRun 'show isis interface' to see which interfaces have ISIS enabledAffected if ISIS is enabled on interfaces connected to untrusted network segments
The device is affected if it runs a vulnerable Junos version with ISIS enabled and has active adjacencies, especially if rpd shows abnormal CPU usage.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped20.4
Upgrade Junos OS/Evolved to the specified patched versions. If immediate patching is not possible, consider isolating ISIS-speaking neighbors or implementing route filtering/ACLs to limit ISIS adjacency to trusted segments.
Junos OS 21.2R2 or later / Junos OS Evolved 21.2R2-EVO or later
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved version running on the device using 'show version'
- 2. Confirm ISIS protocol is in use with 'show isis adjacency'
- 3. Plan maintenance window as upgrade will require a system restart
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed release from Juniper Networks (21.2R2 or later recommended)
- 5. Upload the Junos upgrade package to the device using SCP or FTP
- 6. Run 'request system software add <package-name>' to install the upgrade
- 7. Reboot the device using 'request system reboot' after installation completes
- 8. After reboot, verify the new version with 'show version' and confirm ISIS adjacency is restored with 'show isis adjacency'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22196 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22196 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data