CVE-2022-22213
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in Handling of Undefined Values in the routing protocol daemon (RPD) process of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved may allow an unauthenticated network-based attacker to crash the RPD process by sending a specific BGP update while the system is under heavy load, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. Malicious exploitation of this issue requires a very specific combination of load, timing, and configuration of the vulnerable system which is beyond the direct control of the attacker. Internal reproduction has only been possible through artificially created load and specially instrumented source code. Systems are only vulnerable to this issue if BGP multipath is enabled. Routers not configured for BGP multipath are not vulnerable to this issue. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS: 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S1; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R2-S2, 21.2R3; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R2, 21.3R3; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R1-S1, 21.4R2. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved: 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S1-EVO; 21.2 version 21.2R1-EVO and later versions; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3-EVO; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R1-S1-EVO, 21.4R2-EVO. This issue does not affect: Juniper Networks Junos OS versions prior to 21.1. Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved versions prior to 21.1-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the routing protocol daemon (RPD) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated network-based attacker to crash the RPD process by sending a specific BGP update while the system is under heavy load. The attack requires BGP multipath to be enabled and a very specific combination of load and timing, making exploitation difficult in practice.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 21.1= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 21.1= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Junos versionRun 'show version' on the device CLI to retrieve the installed Junos OS versionAffected if The version displayed is 21.1, 21.2, 21.3, or 21.4 (exact match)
-
Check if BGP multipath is enabledRun 'show configuration protocols bgp' and look for 'multipath' or 'multipath-multiple-as' under the BGP hierarchy or BGP group configurationAffected if BGP multipath feature is configured and enabled in the BGP protocol settings
-
Confirm RPD daemon is runningRun 'show routing daemon' or 'ps aux | grep rpd' to verify the routing protocol daemon process is activeAffected if RPD is running and the device meets both version and BGP multipath conditions
A user is affected if their Junos device runs version 21.1, 21.2, 21.3, or 21.4 AND has BGP multipath enabled in the configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedEnable BGP multipath only if operationally required; disabling BGP multipath eliminates the vulnerability. Alternatively, upgrade to the fixed versions (21.1R3-S1, 21.2R2-S2/21.2R3, 21.3R2-S1/21.3R3, 21.4R1-S1/21.4R2 or later) for Junos OS, or corresponding EVO versions.
Junos OS: 21.1R3-S1, 21.2R2-S2/21.2R3, 21.3R2/21.3R3, 21.4R1-S1/21.4R2 or later; Junos OS Evolved: 21.1R3-S1-EVO, 21.2R3-EVO, 21.3R3-EVO, 21.4R1-S1-EVO/21.4R2-EVO or later
- 1. Verify the current Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved version by running 'show version' or 'show version detail'
- 2. Identify whether BGP multipath is enabled by running 'show configuration protocols bgp' and checking for 'multipath' or 'multipath multiple-as'
- 3. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on your current version: For Junos OS 21.1.x upgrade to 21.1R3-S1 or later; 21.2.x upgrade to 21.2R2-S2, 21.2R3, or later; 21.3.x upgrade to 21.3R2, 21.3R3, or later; 21.4.x upgrade to 21.4R1-S1, 21.4R2, or later
- 4. For Junos OS Evolved: 21.1.x upgrade to 21.1R3-S1-EVO or later; 21.2.x upgrade to 21.2R3-EVO or later; 21.3.x upgrade to 21.3R3-EVO or later; 21.4.x upgrade to 21.4R1-S1-EVO, 21.4R2-EVO, or later
- 5. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrade requires system reboot
- 6. Download the appropriate upgrade package from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 7. Follow standard Junos upgrade procedure: 'request system software add <package> reboot'
- 8. After upgrade, verify BGP multipath configuration is still functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22213 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22213 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data