CVE-2022-22226
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn VxLAN scenarios on EX4300-MP, EX4600, QFX5000 Series devices an Uncontrolled Memory Allocation vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an unauthenticated adjacently located attacker sending specific packets to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) condition by crashing one or more PFE's when they are received and processed by the device. Upon automatic restart of the PFE, continued processing of these packets will cause the memory leak to reappear. Depending on the volume of packets received the attacker may be able to create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS on EX4300-MP, EX4600, QFX5000 Series: 17.1 version 17.1R1 and later versions prior to 17.3R3-S12; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S13, 17.4R3-S5; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S13; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S8; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R3-S5; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R1-S8, 18.4R2-S6, 18.4R3-S6; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R3-S4; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S7, 19.2R3-S1; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S6, 19.3R3-S1; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R1-S4, 19.4R2-S4, 19.4R3-S1; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R2-S3, 20.2R3; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R2. This issue does not affect Junos OS versions prior to 17.1R1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn uncontrolled memory allocation vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on EX4300-MP, EX4600, and QFX5000 Series devices allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to send specific VxLAN packets that cause PFE crashes and memory leaks, leading to sustained DoS conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 17.1= 17.2= 17.2x75= 17.3= 17.4= 18.1= 18.2= 18.3= 18.4= 19.1= 19.2= 19.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show system information' to confirm the device is an EX4300-MP, EX4600, or QFX5000 Series switchAffected if Device model is EX4300-MP, EX4600, or QFX5000 Series
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' and compare the installed Junos version against the affected versions: 17.1, 17.2, 17.2x75, 17.3, 17.4, 18.1, 18.2, 18.3, 18.4, 19.1, 19.2, or 19.3Affected if Installed Junos version matches any of the listed affected versions
-
Verify VxLAN feature is configuredRun 'show configuration protocols vxlan' or 'show configuration vlans' to check for VxLAN-related configurationAffected if VxLAN protocol is enabled or VLANs are configured with VxLAN settings
A user is affected if the device is an EX4300-MP, EX4600, or QFX5000 Series switch running an affected Junos version with VxLAN configured and accessible to adjacent attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the relevant Junos OS software update from the fixed versions listed (17.4R2-S13, 17.4R3-S5, 18.1R3-S13, 18.2R3-S8, 18.3R3-S5, 18.4R3-S6, 19.1R3-S4, 19.2R3-S1, 19.3R3-S1, 19.4R3-S1, 20.1R2, 20.2R3, or 20.3R2 depending on the release train in use).
Upgrade to one of the fixed releases: 17.3R3-S12, 17.4R2-S13, 17.4R3-S5, 18.1R3-S13, 18.2R3-S8, 18.3R3-S5, 18.4R1-S8, 18.4R2-S6, 18.4R3-S6, 19.1R3-S4, 19.2R1-S7, 19.2R3-S1, 19.3R2-S6, 19.3R3-S1, 19.4R1-S4, 19.4R2-S4, 19.4R3-S1, 20.1R2, 20.2R2-S3, 20.2R3, or 20.3R2 (depending on your version branch)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version on the affected EX4300-MP, EX4600, or QFX5000 Series device using 'show version'
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on the current version branch (17.1, 17.2, 17.3, 17.4, 18.x, 19.x, or 20.x)
- 3. Download the corresponding fixed Junos OS release from the Juniper Networks support portal
- 4. Upload the new Junos OS image to the device using 'request system software add <package>' or through the Web UI
- 5. Reboot the device to apply the new software using 'request system reboot'
- 6. After reboot, verify the new version is running with 'show version' and confirm the fix is applied
- 7. If using VxLAN, verify normal operation and monitor for any PFE crashes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22226 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22226 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data