CVE-2022-22235
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based, attacker to cause Denial of Service (DoS). A PFE crash will happen when a GPRS Tunnel Protocol (GTP) packet is received with a malformed field in the IP header of GTP encapsulated General Packet Radio Services (GPRS) traffic. The packet needs to match existing state which is outside the attackers control, so the issue cannot be directly exploited. The issue will only be observed when endpoint address validation is enabled. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series: 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R3-S5; 20.3 versions prior to 20.3R3-S4; 20.4 versions prior to 20.4R3-S3; 21.1 versions prior to 21.1R3-S2; 21.2 versions prior to 21.2R3-S1; 21.3 versions prior to 21.3R3; 21.4 versions prior to 21.4R1-S2, 21.4R2; 22.1 versions prior to 22.1R1-S1, 22.1R2. This issue does not affect Juniper Networks Junos OS versions prior to 20.2R1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series allows an unauthenticated network attacker to cause a Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE) crash via malformed GPRS Tunnel Protocol (GTP) packets. The attack requires GTP traffic matching an existing state and endpoint address validation to be enabled, making direct exploitation difficult but still achievable under specific conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 20.2= 20.3= 20.4= 21.1= 21.2= 21.3= 21.4= 22.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device platformRun 'show chassis hardware' or check device model to confirm it is an SRX Series deviceAffected if Device is not an SRX Series device - this CVE only affects SRX Series
-
Check Junos OS versionRun 'show version' to obtain the installed Junos OS versionAffected if Version matches 20.2, 20.3, 20.4, 21.1, 21.2, 21.3, 21.4, or 22.1 (any variant within these releases)
-
Verify GTP is configuredRun 'show configuration | match gtp' or check the security policy configuration for GTP-u or GTP-c tunnel servicesAffected if GTP tunneling is not configured - the vulnerability requires GTP traffic matching an existing state to be present
-
Check endpoint address validation settingRun 'show configuration services gtp' and look for 'endpoint-address-validation' under the GTP profile, or check the specific GTP profile applied to your GTP policyAffected if Endpoint address validation is enabled - the CVE requires this feature to be enabled for exploitation
A user is affected if they are running an affected Junos version on SRX Series with GTP configured and endpoint address validation enabled in the GTP profile.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Junos OS versions 20.2R3-S5, 20.3R3-S4, 20.4R3-S3, 21.1R3-S2, 21.2R3-S1, 21.3R3, 21.4R1-S2, 21.4R2, or 22.1R1-S1/22.1R2 as appropriate. Alternatively, disable endpoint address validation in the GTP profile if upgrading is not immediately feasible.
Upgrade to 20.2R3-S5 / 20.3R3-S4 / 20.4R3-S3 / 21.1R3-S2 / 21.2R3-S1 / 21.3R3 / 21.4R2 / 22.1R2 or later based on current version
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version on the SRX Series device using 'show version' command.
- 2. Based on the current version, upgrade to the fixed release: For 20.2.x upgrade to 20.2R3-S5 or later; For 20.3.x upgrade to 20.3R3-S4 or later; For 20.4.x upgrade to 20.4R3-S3 or later; For 21.1.x upgrade to 21.1R3-S2 or later; For 21.2.x upgrade to 21.2R3-S1 or later; For 21.3.x upgrade to 21.3R3 or later; For 21.4.x upgrade to 21.4R2 or later; For 22.1.x upgrade to 22.1R2 or later.
- 3. Upload the Junos upgrade package to the device via FTP/SCP.
- 4. Execute 'request system software add <package-name>' to install the upgrade.
- 5. Reboot the device using 'request system reboot' to apply changes.
- 6. After reboot, verify the new version is installed with 'show version' and confirm the GTP endpoint address validation feature functions correctly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22235 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22235 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data