Robotic Process AutomationApplication · Ibm

CVE-2022-22319

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-05-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.1 could allow a register user on the system to physically delete a queue that could cause disruption for any scripts dependent on the queue. IBM X-Force ID: 218366.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.1 lacks proper authorization controls on queue deletion, allowing any authenticated user to delete queues. This causes denial of service for automated scripts and workflows that depend on those queues, as they lose access to critical processing queues.

MitigationImplement role-based access control (RBAC) to restrict queue deletion permissions to administrators only, and validate user permissions before any destructive queue operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Robotic Process AutomationApplication
Affected:= 21.0.1= 21.0.1.2
Robotic Process Automation As A ServiceApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed IBM RPA version
    Check the product version in the IBM Robotic Process Automation installation directory or via the admin console. On Windows, look in the installation folder for version.info or check Help > About in the RPA platform. For the SaaS offering, check the tenant administration panel for version information.
    Affected if The installed version is 21.0.1 or 21.0.1.2, or the product is IBM RPA As A Service (any version)
  2. Confirm queue functionality is in use
    Access the RPA platform web interface or client and navigate to the queue management section. Verify that queue objects exist in the environment and are actively used by bots or workflows.
    Affected if Queues are present and actively used by automation workflows in the environment
  3. Test queue deletion authorization
    Log in to the RPA platform with a non-administrator user account that has standard or limited permissions. Navigate to an existing queue and attempt to delete it using the queue management interface or API.
    Affected if A non-administrator user is able to successfully delete a queue without receiving an authorization or permission denied error
  4. Verify RBAC configuration for queues
    Access the administration or security settings panel in the RPA platform. Examine the role-based access control configuration for queue operations, specifically looking for permissions assigned to roles regarding queue deletion.
    Affected if No RBAC controls exist or the delete queue permission is granted to non-administrator roles

You are affected if your environment runs IBM RPA version 21.0.1, 21.0.1.2, or is the As A Service offering, and non-administrator users can delete queues without proper authorization checks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement role-based access control (RBAC) to restrict queue deletion permissions to administrators only, and validate user permissions before any destructive queue operations.

Fix this in Robotic Process Automation Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22319 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22319 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data