CVE-2022-22350
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM AIX 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, and VIOS 3.1 could allow a non-privileged local user to exploit a vulnerability in CAA to cause a denial of service. IBM X-Force ID: 220394.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA local privilege vulnerability in IBM's Cluster Aware AIX (CAA) component allows a non-privileged local user to cause a denial of service on affected AIX 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and VIOS 3.1 systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.1= 7.1= 7.2= 7.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check AIX or VIOS versionRun 'oslevel -s' on the system to get the full version level (e.g., 7200-05-01-2231)Affected if The version starts with 7100, 7200, or 7300 (for AIX) or shows a VIOS version of 3.1.x
-
Verify CAA filesets are installedRun 'lslpp -l cluster.aware.aix.rte' or 'lslpp -l | grep -i caa' to list installed Cluster Aware AIX filesetsAffected if The cluster.aware.aix.rte or related CAA filesets are installed
-
Check if CAA clustering is activeRun 'lscluster -c' to display CAA cluster status, or use 'clstat -a' if cluster services are runningAffected if CAA cluster is configured or active (the vulnerability can be exploited when CAA is running)
-
Identify running CAA processesRun 'ps -ef | grep -i cl' or 'ps -ef | grep cluster' to look for cluster daemon processes such as 'clconfd' or 'clmuxd'Affected if CAA cluster daemon processes (clconfd, clmuxd, etc.) are running on the system
The system is affected if it runs AIX 7.1/7.2/7.3 or VIOS 3.1 AND has the Cluster Aware AIX component installed and active, allowing a local non-privileged user to trigger denial of service.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply IBM's security patches for this vulnerability as referenced in the IBM security bulletin (X-Force ID 220394); restrict unauthorized local user access to systems running the CAA clustering component.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22350 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22350 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data