dbcve.org
Security Verify Privilege On PremisesApplication · Ibm

CVE-2022-22385

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-10-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 11.5 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could disclose sensitive information to an attacked due to the transmission of data in clear text. IBM X-Force ID: 221962.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis
How this class of weakness works · CWE-319

Sensitive information is transmitted over an unencrypted channel, so anyone positioned on the network path can read it as it passes. Credentials, tokens, and personal data are the usual casualties. The fix is to encrypt everything sensitive in transit with TLS and to remove any plaintext fallback.

General guidance for the cleartext transmission class — the official description and references above are authoritative for this specific CVE. Want a bespoke review and a reviewed fix? Ask our team →

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Security Verify Privilege On PremisesApplication
Affected:< 11.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 11.5 or later
Fixed in 11.5
Vendor patch www.ibm.com →
Recommended fix High confidence

11.5

  1. Back up your current IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises installation and configuration data
  2. Download the security fix from IBM Fix Central or the vendor support page at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7047202
  3. Review the IBM installation and migration documentation for version 11.5
  4. Apply the fix following IBM's standard upgrade procedure for Security Verify Privilege On-Premises
  5. Verify the fix was applied successfully and confirm cleartext transmission is no longer occurring
  6. Test that all critical business functions work correctly after the upgrade
Caveat Standard upgrade precautions apply - review IBM's migration guide for version 11.5 and test in non-production environment first

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can perform the upgrade in your staging environment and verify nothing breaks — typical engagement from $1,950. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22385 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22385 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data