Spectrum Protect PlusApplication · Ibm

CVE-2022-22396

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-06-06
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 10.1.10 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Credentials are printed in clear text in the IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.9.3 virgo log file in certain cases. Credentials could be the remote vSnap, offload targets, or VADP credentials depending on the operation performed. Credentials that are using API key or certificate are not printed. IBM X-Force ID: 222231.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus versions 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.9.3 write credentials in clear text to the virgo log file. The vulnerability affects remote vSnap, offload target, and VADP credentials depending on the operation performed, but does NOT affect API key or certificate-based credentials. This exposes sensitive authentication credentials to anyone with access to the log files.

MitigationUpgrade to IBM Spectrum Protect Plus version 10.1.9.4 or later. Until upgraded, restrict access to virgo log files to authorized personnel only to minimize exposure risk.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Spectrum Protect PlusApplication
Affected:>= 10.1.0, < 10.1.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed IBM Spectrum Protect Plus version
    Use the product's administrative console or command-line interface to retrieve the current version number
    Affected if The installed version is 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.9.3 (versions >= 10.1.0 and < 10.1.10)
  2. Locate virgo log files
    Access the log directory where virgo logs are stored; these are the log files used by the IBM Spectrum Protect Plus application
    Affected if Virgo log files exist and are accessible to the checking user
  3. Search for cleartext credentials in virgo logs
    Examine the virgo log files for plain text strings matching remote vSnap credentials, offload target credentials, or VADP credentials
    Affected if Cleartext credentials for remote vSnap, offload targets, or VADP are found in the virgo logs
  4. Verify affected credential types are in use
    Determine whether the environment uses remote vSnap, offload target, or VADP credentials (as opposed to only API keys or certificates)
    Affected if The environment uses vSnap, offload target, or VADP credentials that could have been logged

You are affected if your IBM Spectrum Protect Plus version is between 10.1.0 and 10.1.9.3 inclusive AND you use remote vSnap, offload target, or VADP credentials AND those credentials appear in cleartext in your virgo log files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 10.1.10 or later
Fixed in 10.1.10
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to IBM Spectrum Protect Plus version 10.1.9.4 or later. Until upgraded, restrict access to virgo log files to authorized personnel only to minimize exposure risk.

Recommended fix High confidence

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus 10.1.10 or later

  1. Backup the current IBM Spectrum Protect Plus installation and database
  2. Plan maintenance window for the upgrade
  3. Upgrade IBM Spectrum Protect Plus to version 10.1.10 or later
  4. After upgrade, verify the virgo log files no longer contain clear text credentials for remote vSnap, offload targets, or VADP credentials
  5. Confirm all operations are functioning normally post-upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Spectrum Protect Plus Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22396 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22396 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data