CVE-2022-22466
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Security Verify Governance 10.0 contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. IBM X-Force ID: 225222.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM Security Verify Governance 10.0 contains hard-coded credentials (passwords or cryptographic keys) embedded in the product. These credentials are used for three distinct purposes: inbound authentication to the system itself, outbound communication to external components, and encryption of internal data. An attacker with knowledge of these credentials could authenticate as legitimate users, intercept or manipulate external communications, or decrypt sensitive internal data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.0, < 10.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed version of IBM Security Verify GovernanceUse the product's version check mechanism (typically via admin console, command line, or version file) to determine the exact installed versionAffected if The installed version is 10.0.0 or 10.0.1 (falls in the range >= 10.0 and < 10.0.2)
-
Search for hard-coded passwords in configuration filesInspect configuration directories and files (such as XML, properties, or config files in the installation directory) for embedded password strings used for authenticationAffected if Plaintext or encoded passwords are found hard-coded in configuration files for inbound authentication or user accounts
-
Search for hard-coded credentials used for outbound communicationReview configuration files and connection settings that define external system connections (databases, LDAP, APIs, or other integrations) for embedded credentialsAffected if Credentials used to connect to external components are found hard-coded rather than managed through secrets management
-
Search for hard-coded cryptographic keysInspect application files, key stores, or configuration for embedded encryption keys used for internal data protectionAffected if Cryptographic keys or secrets used for encrypting internal data are found hard-coded in the product
-
Audit authentication and encryption configurationsReview the product's security configuration settings, particularly authentication mechanisms and data encryption settings, to identify any using built-in static credentialsAffected if Authentication modules, encryption settings, or security configurations rely on built-in credentials that cannot be changed or are not managed externally
A user is affected if their IBM Security Verify Governance installation is version 10.0 or 10.0.1 AND contains hard-coded credentials (passwords or cryptographic keys) embedded in configuration files, authentication modules, or encryption settings.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.2
Identify and replace all hard-coded credentials with properly managed secrets using a secrets management solution (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, IBM Cloud Secrets Manager, or environment variables). Immediately rotate any credentials that may have been exposed. Test all authentication, communication, and encryption functions after remediation.
10.0.2
- Backup the current IBM Security Verify Governance installation and configuration
- Review IBM documentation and release notes for version 10.0.2 for any specific upgrade requirements
- Upgrade IBM Security Verify Governance from the current 10.0.x version to version 10.0.2
- After upgrade, verify that all services are running correctly
- Change any default or hard-coded credentials as part of standard hardening procedures following the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation20.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22466 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22466 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data