ProfinetApplication · Codesys

CVE-2022-22510

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-02-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Codesys Profinet in version V4.2.0.0 is prone to null pointer dereference that allows a denial of service (DoS) attack of an unauthenticated user via SNMP.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

CODESYS Profinet V4.2.0.0 contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability that can be triggered by an unauthenticated attacker via SNMP requests, leading to a denial of service condition. The vulnerability exists specifically within the Profinet component handling SNMP protocol processing.

MitigationUpdate to a patched version of CODESYS Profinet when available; meanwhile, restrict SNMP access through network segmentation and firewall rules to prevent unauthenticated external access.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ProfinetApplication
Affected:= 4.2.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if CODESYS Profinet is installed
    Check system for CODESYS Profinet installation. Look for CODESYS runtime components, typically installed in C:\Program Files\CODESYS or similar paths. Use system inventory or program list to confirm presence.
    Affected if CODESYS Profinet software is present on the system
  2. Verify installed Profinet version
    Check the installed version of CODESYS Profinet. This is typically found in the software itself via Help > About, or in the Windows Programs and Features list, or by checking the executable properties if the installation path is known.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 4.2.0.0
  3. Confirm SNMP is enabled in Profinet
    Inspect the Profinet configuration settings to determine if SNMP protocol handling is enabled. This is usually configured within the CODESYS Development System or the Profinet device configuration interface. Look for SNMP settings in the Profinet stack or network adapter configuration.
    Affected if SNMP is enabled and accessible to the Profinet component
  4. Check network exposure of SNMP service
    Review firewall rules and network configuration to determine if the SNMP service (typically UDP port 161) is exposed to untrusted networks or accessible from external interfaces. Verify if network segmentation isolates the industrial system.
    Affected if SNMP is accessible from untrusted network segments or external IP addresses

You are affected if CODESYS Profinet version 4.2.0.0 is installed with SNMP enabled and accessible, as the vulnerability requires the Profinet SNMP processing component to be reachable by an unauthenticated attacker.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to a patched version of CODESYS Profinet when available; meanwhile, restrict SNMP access through network segmentation and firewall rules to prevent unauthenticated external access.

Fix this in Profinet Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,330
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22510 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22510 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data