FirefoxWeb browser · Mozilla

CVE-2022-22761

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-12-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 91.6 / 97.0 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Web-accessible extension pages (pages with a moz-extension:// scheme) were not correctly enforcing the frame-ancestors directive when it was used in the Web Extension's Content Security Policy. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 97, Thunderbird < 91.6, and Firefox ESR < 91.6.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Web extension pages using the moz-extension:// scheme were not correctly enforcing the frame-ancestors directive in the Content Security Policy, potentially allowing clickjacking or unauthorized framing of extension pages.

MitigationUpgrade to Firefox 97+, Thunderbird 91.6+, or Firefox ESR 91.6+ to apply the patched Content Security Policy enforcement for extension pages.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FirefoxWeb browser
Affected:< 97.0
Firefox EsrWeb browser
Affected:< 91.6
ThunderbirdApplication
Affected:< 91.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Firefox browser version
    Open Firefox and navigate to about:support, or run `firefox --version` in terminal. Locate the 'Version' field.
    Affected if Version is below 97.0 (e.g., 96.x or earlier)
  2. Check Firefox ESR version
    Open Firefox ESR and navigate to about:support, or run `firefox --version` in terminal. Locate the 'Version' field.
    Affected if Version is below 91.6 (e.g., 91.5.x or earlier)
  3. Check Thunderbird version
    Open Thunderbird and navigate to Help > About, or run `thunderbird --version` in terminal.
    Affected if Version is below 91.6 (e.g., 91.5.x or earlier)
  4. Identify installed extensions
    In Firefox/Thunderbird, navigate to about:addons and review the list of installed extensions and themes.
    Affected if Any browser extensions or add-ons are installed, as these use the moz-extension:// scheme and could be subject to framing

You are affected if your Firefox version is below 97.0, Firefox ESR is below 91.6, or Thunderbird is below 91.6, and you have any extensions or add-ons installed that utilize the moz-extension:// scheme.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 91.6 / 97.0 or later
Fixed in 91.697.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Firefox 97+, Thunderbird 91.6+, or Firefox ESR 91.6+ to apply the patched Content Security Policy enforcement for extension pages.

Recommended fix High confidence

Firefox 97.0, Firefox ESR 91.6, or Thunderbird 91.6

  1. For Firefox users: Update to version 97.0 or later via Help > About Firefox > Update
  2. For Firefox ESR users: Update to version 91.6 or later via Help > About Firefox > Update
  3. For Thunderbird users: Update to version 91.6 or later via Help > About Thunderbird > Check for Updates
  4. Alternatively, download the latest versions from the official Mozilla website: www.mozilla.org
Caveat Mozilla routine updates typically have minimal breaking changes; review release notes for any behavioral changes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Firefox Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22761 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22761 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data