CVE-2022-22772
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe cfsend, cfrecv, and CyberResp components of TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO Managed File Transfer Platform Server for UNIX and TIBCO Managed File Transfer Platform Server for z/Linux contain a difficult to exploit Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability that allows a low privileged attacker with network access to execute arbitrary code on the affected system. Affected releases are TIBCO Software Inc.'s TIBCO Managed File Transfer Platform Server for UNIX: versions 8.1.0 and below and TIBCO Managed File Transfer Platform Server for z/Linux: versions 8.1.0 and below.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRCE vulnerability in the cfsend, cfrecv, and CyberResp components of TIBCO Managed File Transfer Platform Server for UNIX and z/Linux versions 8.1.0 and below. Allows a low privileged attacker with network access to execute arbitrary code on affected systems, though exploitation is described as difficult to exploit.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify TIBCO Managed File Transfer Platform Server installationLocate TIBCO MFT installation directories or check system for MFT-related processes and services. Common locations include /opt/tibco or installation directories documented in TIBCO deployment guides.Affected if TIBCO Managed File Transfer Platform Server is installed on UNIX or z/Linux systems.
-
Determine installed version of TIBCO MFT Platform ServerCheck the version of the installed TIBCO MFT Platform Server. Use TIBCO command-line utilities if available, or check version files in the installation directory.Affected if The installed version is 8.1.0 or below (versions prior to 8.1.1).
-
Verify affected components are presentInspect the TIBCO MFT installation for the cfsend, cfrecv, and CyberResp components. Check component directories or configuration files that define enabled MFT components.Affected if The cfsend, cfrecv, or CyberResp components are installed and enabled on the system.
-
Assess network exposure of MFT componentsReview network configurations, firewall rules, and access controls surrounding the TIBCO MFT installation. Determine if cfsend, cfrecv, and CyberResp components are accessible over the network.Affected if The affected components are network-accessible without proper restriction.
The environment is affected if TIBCO Managed File Transfer Platform Server for UNIX or z/Linux is installed at version 8.1.0 or below with cfsend, cfrecv, or CyberResp components enabled and network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.1.1
Apply vendor patch/upgrade to a version above 8.1.0 for TIBCO Managed File Transfer Platform Server. Until patched, restrict network access to MFT components and monitor for suspicious activity.
TIBCO Managed File Transfer Platform Server 8.1.1 (or later) for UNIX and z/Linux
- Upgrade TIBCO Managed File Transfer Platform Server for UNIX to version 8.1.1 or later
- Upgrade TIBCO Managed File Transfer Platform Server for z/Linux to version 8.1.1 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version
- Test that the cfsend, cfrecv, and CyberResp components function correctly after upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22772 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22772 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data