PillowApplication · Python

CVE-2022-22817

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-01-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 9.0.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method. A lambda expression could also be used.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The PIL.ImageMath.eval function in Pillow before version 9.0.0 improperly validates input, allowing attackers to pass arbitrary Python expressions that can execute code via the exec method or lambda expressions. This enables remote code execution with the privileges of the process using the library.

MitigationUpgrade Pillow to version 9.0.0 or later. If upgrading is not feasible, ensure no untrusted user input is passed to PIL.ImageMath.eval and consider input validation or sandboxing as a temporary measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PillowApplication
Affected:< 9.0.1
Debian LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 9.0= 10.0= 11.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Pillow version
    Run 'pip show pillow' or 'pip list | grep -i pillow' to see the installed version number
    Affected if Version is below 9.0.1 (e.g., 9.0.0, 8.x.x, or earlier)
  2. Identify code using PIL.ImageMath.eval
    Search project source files for imports of 'ImageMath' and usage of '.eval(' (e.g., grep -r 'ImageMath' and grep -r '\.eval(')
    Affected if Code calls ImageMath.eval() with any user-controlled input
  3. Audit input sources to ImageMath.eval
    Review where the arguments to ImageMath.eval come from: check if they originate from HTTP requests, file uploads, command-line arguments, or other untrusted sources
    Affected if Any expression passed to ImageMath.eval can be influenced by external users or untrusted data
  4. Check for unsafe expression handling patterns
    Look for patterns like ImageMath.eval(user_variable) or ImageMath.eval(expression_from_request) in the codebase
    Affected if The code passes unsanitized variables directly to the eval function without validation or allowlist filtering

You are affected if Pillow version is below 9.0.1 AND your code passes any user-provided or untrusted input to PIL.ImageMath.eval().

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 9.0.1 or later
Fixed in 9.0.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Pillow to version 9.0.0 or later. If upgrading is not feasible, ensure no untrusted user input is passed to PIL.ImageMath.eval and consider input validation or sandboxing as a temporary measure.

Recommended fix High confidence

Pillow >= 9.0.1

  1. Check the current installed version of Pillow using: pip show pillow or pip list | grep -i pillow
  2. Upgrade Pillow to version 9.0.1 or later using: pip install --upgrade 'Pillow>=9.0.1'
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version again
  4. If using a system package manager (e.g., apt, yum), update the system package for python3-pillow to the patched version available in your distribution's security updates
Caveat Minor: The ImageMath.eval function now has restrictions on what expressions can be evaluated for security reasons; legacy code relying on unsafe eval patterns may need adjustment

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Pillow Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,340
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,144.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-22817 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-22817 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data