CVE-2022-23018
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn BIG-IP AFM version 16.1.x before 16.1.2, 15.1.x before 15.1.4.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4.5, and 13.1.x beginning in 13.1.3.4, when a virtual server is configured with both HTTP protocol security and HTTP Proxy Connect profiles, undisclosed requests can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn F5 BIG-IP AFM, a vulnerability exists where virtual servers configured with both HTTP protocol security and HTTP Proxy Connect profiles can be triggered by specific requests to cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 13.1.3.4, < 13.1.4.1>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.4.5>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.4.1>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify BIG-IP AFM is installedRun 'tmsh show sys module' or check the UI under System > Software Management > BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager to confirm the AFM module is provisionedAffected if AFM module is not installed or not provisioned - the vulnerability only affects systems with AFM enabled
-
Check BIG-IP version against affected rangesRun 'tmsh show sys version' or check the UI under Dashboard to view the installed versionAffected if Version matches any of these ranges: 13.1.3.4-13.1.4.0, 14.1.0-14.1.4.4, 15.1.0-15.1.4.0, 16.1.0-16.1.1 - versions outside these ranges are not affected
-
Identify virtual servers with HTTP protocol security profileRun 'tmsh list ltm virtual one-line' and look for 'profile http' entries that include protocol security, or inspect each virtual server in the UI under Local Traffic > Virtual Servers and check the Security > Polices section for HTTP protocol security profileAffected if No virtual servers have HTTP protocol security profile enabled - the attack requires this profile to be present
-
Identify virtual servers with HTTP Proxy Connect profileRun 'tmsh list ltm virtual one-line' and look for 'profile connect' entries, or inspect each virtual server in the UI under Local Traffic > Virtual Servers and check the HTTP Profile settings for HTTP Proxy ConnectAffected if No virtual servers have HTTP Proxy Connect profile enabled - the attack requires this profile to be present
-
Confirm virtual servers with BOTH profiles appliedFor each virtual server identified in steps 3 and 4, verify if the same virtual server has both an HTTP protocol security profile AND an HTTP Proxy Connect profile configured simultaneouslyAffected if Any virtual server has BOTH profiles applied at the same time - this is the specific configuration that triggers the vulnerability
A system is affected only if it runs a vulnerable BIG-IP AFM version AND has at least one virtual server configured with both an HTTP protocol security profile and an HTTP Proxy Connect profile simultaneously.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped13.1.4.114.1.4.515.1.4.1
Apply the vendor patches (16.1.2, 15.1.4.1, 14.1.4.5 or later) or temporarily remove one of the conflicting profiles (HTTP protocol security or HTTP Proxy Connect) from affected virtual servers until patching is feasible.
Upgrade to 13.1.4.1+ (for 13.1.x), 14.1.4.5+ (for 14.1.x), 15.1.4.1+ (for 15.1.x), or 16.1.2+ (for 16.1.x)
- Identify the currently installed BIG-IP AFM version using 'tmsh show sys version' or the web management console.
- Determine which version branch (13.1.x, 14.1.x, 15.1.x, or 16.1.x) your current installation uses.
- Review the configuration of affected virtual servers to identify any that have both HTTP protocol security and HTTP Proxy Connect profiles enabled.
- Download the appropriate fixed version from F5 Networks: 13.1.4.1 or later, 14.1.4.5 or later, 15.1.4.1 or later, or 16.1.2 or later.
- Follow F5's upgrade documentation to apply the update, ensuring to backup configuration before proceeding.
- After upgrade, verify the virtual server configurations and test that TMM no longer terminates on the previously affected requests.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-23018 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-23018 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data