CVE-2022-23021
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn BIG-IP version 16.1.x before 16.1.2, when any of the following configurations are configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate: HTTP redirect rule in an LTM policy, BIG-IP APM Access Profile, and Explicit HTTP Proxy in HTTP Profile. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP versions 16.1.x before 16.1.2 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to crash the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) via specially crafted HTTP requests when specific configurations are enabled: HTTP redirect rules in LTM policies, BIG-IP APM Access Profiles, or Explicit HTTP Proxy in HTTP Profiles.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.2>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.2>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.2>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.2>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.2>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.2>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.2>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify BIG-IP versionUse the command 'tmsh show sys version' or check the BIG-IP GUI under System > Software Management > Installed Volume to find the installed BIG-IP version.Affected if The installed version is 16.1.0, 16.1.0.x, or 16.1.1 (any version 16.1.x before 16.1.2).
-
Check for HTTP redirect rules in LTM policiesReview LTM policies via tmsh using 'tmsh list ltm policy' or via the GUI under Local Traffic > Policies to identify any policies containing HTTP redirect actions.Affected if HTTP redirect rules are configured in any LTM policy.
-
Check for APM Access ProfilesReview APM configuration via tmsh using 'tmsh list apm profile access' or via the GUI under Access Policy > Access Profiles to identify any active Access Profiles.Affected if Any APM Access Profile is created and enabled.
-
Check for Explicit HTTP Proxy in HTTP ProfilesReview HTTP profiles via tmsh using 'tmsh list ltm profile http' or via the GUI under Local Traffic > Profiles > HTTP to identify profiles with Explicit Proxy enabled.Affected if Any HTTP profile has Explicit HTTP Proxy configuration enabled.
A user is affected if their BIG-IP runs version 16.1.0 through 16.1.1 AND has any of these three configurations enabled: HTTP redirect rules in LTM policies, APM Access Profiles, or Explicit HTTP Proxy in HTTP Profiles.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.1.2
Upgrade BIG-IP to version 16.1.2 or later. For systems that cannot be immediately upgraded, implement network-level filtering to block malicious requests or disable the affected configurations if not required.
BIG-IP version 16.1.2 or later
- 1. Identify all BIG-IP devices running version 16.1.0 or 16.1.1 in the environment
- 2. Review the virtual server configurations to determine if any use HTTP redirect rules in LTM policies, BIG-IP APM Access Profiles, or Explicit HTTP Proxy in HTTP Profiles
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- 4. Download BIG-IP version 16.1.2 or later from the F5 Networks download site (support.f5.com)
- 5. Upload the ISO image to the BIG-IP device
- 6. Follow F5 upgrade procedures to install version 16.1.2
- 7. After upgrade, verify that TMM is running normally and the affected virtual servers are functional
- 8. Monitor for any unexpected TMM terminations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-23021 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-23021 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data