Debian Package BuilderApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2022-23118

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-01-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.6.11 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jenkins Debian Package Builder Plugin 1.6.11 and earlier implements functionality that allows agents to invoke command-line `git` at an attacker-specified path on the controller, allowing attackers able to control agent processes to invoke arbitrary OS commands on the controller.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Jenkins Debian Package Builder Plugin versions 1.6.11 and earlier allows agent processes to specify an arbitrary filesystem path for the git executable, which is then invoked on the controller. An attacker who controls the agent (through compromised agent processes or malicious agent configurations) can specify a malicious executable path to achieve arbitrary OS command execution on the controller.

MitigationUpgrade the Jenkins Debian Package Builder Plugin to version 1.6.12 or later, which implements proper path validation. Until then, restrict or disable untrusted agent connections and review agent process configurations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Debian Package BuilderApplication
Affected:<= 1.6.11

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify the Debian Package Builder Plugin is installed
    Navigate to Jenkins Manage Plugins > Installed and search for 'Debian Package Builder' or check the plugin directory $JENKINS_HOME/plugins for the debian-package-builder folder
    Affected if The plugin is present in the Jenkins instance
  2. Determine the installed plugin version
    In Jenkins Manage Plugins > Installed, locate the Debian Package Builder plugin and note the version number displayed
    Affected if The version is 1.6.11 or earlier
  3. Identify connected or configured agents
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Nodes and review all configured agents, noting any that are untrusted or from untrusted sources
    Affected if There are agents connected that are not fully trusted or whose processes could be controlled by untrusted users
  4. Check for agent-accessible git configuration
    Review the Debian Package Builder job configurations and global configuration to see if agents can supply or modify the git executable path setting
    Affected if The plugin configuration allows agents to specify custom git executable paths that get executed on the controller

A user is affected if the Debian Package Builder Plugin version 1.6.11 or earlier is installed AND untrusted or compromised agents can connect to the Jenkins controller.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.6.11
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the Jenkins Debian Package Builder Plugin to version 1.6.12 or later, which implements proper path validation. Until then, restrict or disable untrusted agent connections and review agent process configurations.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.6.12 or later

  1. Navigate to the Jenkins dashboard
  2. Go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins
  3. Click on the 'Installed' tab
  4. Find 'Debian Package Builder' in the list
  5. If the installed version is 1.6.11 or earlier, click 'Update now' to upgrade to the fixed version
  6. Restart Jenkins if required to complete the installation

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Debian Package Builder Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-23118 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-23118 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data