CVE-2022-23130
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer Over-read vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MC Works64 versions 4.00A to 4.04E, Mitsubishi Electric GENESIS64 versions 10.97 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions GENESIS64 versions 10.97 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric ICONICS Suite versions 10.97 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions ICONICS Suite versions 10.97 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric GENESIS32 versions 9.7 and prior, and Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions GENESIS32 versions 9.7 and prior allows an attacker to cause a DoS condition in the database server by getting a legitimate user to import a configuration file containing specially crafted stored procedures into GENESIS64, ICONICS Suite, MC Works64, or GENESIS32 and execute commands against the database from GENESIS64, ICONICS Suite, MC Works64, or GENESIS32.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBuffer over-read vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric/ICONICS suite products (GENESIS64, ICONICS Suite, MC Works64, GENESIS32) allows an attacker to cause denial of service in the database server by tricking a legitimate user into importing a configuration file containing specially crafted stored procedures that can then be executed against the database.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 10.97<= 10.97>= 10.95.201.23, <= 10.95.210.01CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Genesis64 versionLocate the GENESIS64 installation directory and check the version information in the About dialog or in the version.dll file properties. Common paths include C:\Program Files\ICONICS\GENESIS64\ or check the Windows Programs and Features list.Affected if Installed version is 10.97 or lower (any version <= 10.97)
-
Check Hyper Historian versionOpen Hyper Historian Administrator or check the Windows Programs and Features for the installed version. The product typically installs under C:\Program Files\ICONICS\HyperHistorian\.Affected if Installed version is 10.97 or lower (any version <= 10.97)
-
Check MC Works64 versionAccess the MC Works64 application information through Windows Programs and Features or check the installation directory for version details. Look for versions between 10.95.201.23 and 10.95.210.01 inclusive.Affected if Installed version is between 10.95.201.23 and 10.95.210.01 inclusive
-
Verify configuration import functionalityCheck if the configuration file import feature is accessible in the affected applications. Look for import options in the enterprise administration tools, Workbench, or Database Manager components that allow importing stored procedures or configuration files.Affected if Configuration file import for stored procedures is available and not restricted
-
Assess database server exposureIdentify if the application is configured to connect to a backend database server (SQL Server or similar) and check network accessibility of the database port.Affected if The application connects to a database server and that server is network-accessible from the application tier
You are affected if any of the products (Genesis64, Hyper Historian, or MC Works64) are installed at versions within the affected ranges AND the configuration file import feature is accessible to users who could be tricked into importing malicious files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict configuration file imports to only verified sources, implement strict input validation on imported configuration files, and update to vendor-patched versions when available. Consider network segmentation to isolate database servers from affected application tiers.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-23130 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-23130 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data