CVE-2022-23143
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedZTE OTCP product is impacted by a permission and access control vulnerability. Due to improper permission settings, an attacker with high permissions could use this vulnerability to maliciously delete and modify files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an access control vulnerability in ZTE OTCP where improper permission settings allow authenticated attackers with high privileges to maliciously delete and modify files on the system. The vulnerability stems from insufficient authorization controls that fail to properly restrict file operations for privileged users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.21.40.06CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the ZTE OTCP firmware versionLocate the firmware version information in the ZTE OTCP system - this is typically found in the system information page, CLI show version command, or system settings panelAffected if The installed firmware version is lower than 2.21.40.06
-
Verify if file operation features are accessibleCheck whether the file management or file operation interface is exposed to authenticated users - this includes any web panel, CLI file commands, or API endpoints that allow file deletion or modificationAffected if High-privilege authenticated users can access file operation features without additional authorization checks
-
Inspect permission configuration for file operationsReview the authorization or permission settings that control which users can perform file delete and modify actions within ZTE OTCP - look for role-based access control (RBAC) settings or file operation permission policiesAffected if The permission configuration allows privileged users to perform unrestricted file operations without proper authorization validation
-
Confirm authenticated access is possibleDetermine if the system allows authenticated access for privileged accounts - verify that user authentication is enabled and high-privilege user accounts exist in the ZTE OTCP environmentAffected if Authenticated attackers with high privileges can access the system
You are affected if your ZTE OTCP firmware version is below 2.21.40.06 AND your system allows authenticated high-privilege users to perform file delete/modify operations without proper authorization controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.21.40.06
Review and remediate the permission configuration in ZTE OTCP to enforce proper authorization controls on file operations. Apply any vendor-supplied patches or security updates addressing this access control weakness.
ZTE OTCP Firmware version 2.21.40.06 or later
- 1. Identify the current firmware version of the ZTE OTCP device by accessing the device management interface or using the appropriate CLI command.
- 2. Navigate to the official ZTE support portal at support.zte.com.cn and locate the firmware download section for the OTCP product.
- 3. Download the latest OTCP firmware version (2.21.40.06 or higher) from the official ZTE support site.
- 4. Review the firmware upgrade instructions provided by ZTE in the product documentation or release notes.
- 5. Apply the firmware upgrade to the OTCP device following the recommended upgrade procedure, ensuring stable power supply during the process.
- 6. After upgrade completion, verify the new firmware version is installed correctly.
- 7. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by verifying proper permission settings are in place according to ZTE's security configuration guidelines.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-23143 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-23143 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data