Debian LinuxOperating system · Debian

CVE-2022-23479

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-12-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.9.21 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
xrdp is an open source project which provides a graphical login to remote machines using Microsoft Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). xrdp < v0.9.21 contain a buffer over flow in xrdp_mm_chan_data_in() function. There are no known workarounds for this issue. Users are advised to upgrade.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

xrdp versions before v0.9.21 contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the xrdp_mm_chan_data_in() function, which handles incoming channel data for RDP connections. This memory corruption flaw in the remote desktop service could allow unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service.

MitigationUpgrade xrdp to version 0.9.21 or later. There are no known workarounds; immediate patching is required given the critical CVSS score and network-exposed attack surface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Debian LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 11.0
XrdpApplication
Affected:< 0.9.21

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if xrdp is installed
    Run 'dpkg -l xrdp' on Debian-based systems or 'rpm -qa | grep xrdp' on RHEL-based systems to check if the xrdp package is present
    Affected if xrdp package is found installed on the system
  2. Determine the installed xrdp version
    Run 'dpkg -l xrdp' or 'rpm -q xrdp' to retrieve the installed version number, or check the xrdp daemon version with 'xrdp -v' if available
    Affected if The displayed version is lower than 0.9.21 or the version cannot be determined (may indicate an older release)
  3. Verify the xrdp service is enabled and running
    Run 'systemctl status xrdp' or check if port 3389 is listening with 'ss -tlnp | grep 3389' or 'netstat -tlnp | grep 3389'
    Affected if The xrdp service is active and listening for RDP connections, making the vulnerability reachable over the network
  4. Confirm the channel data feature is in use
    The vulnerability exists in xrdp_mm_chan_data_in() which handles incoming channel data for RDP sessions. Any active RDP connection or session using channel data would trigger the vulnerable code path. Check if remote desktop connections are permitted via '/etc/xrdp/xrdp.ini' configuration
    Affected if RDP connections are allowed and the xrdp service is exposed to network traffic

A system is affected if xrdp is installed with a version lower than 0.9.21 and the service is running and accessible for incoming RDP connections.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.9.21 or later
Fixed in 0.9.21
Interim mitigation

Upgrade xrdp to version 0.9.21 or later. There are no known workarounds; immediate patching is required given the critical CVSS score and network-exposed attack surface.

Recommended fix High confidence

xrdp v0.9.21 or later

  1. Check current installed xrdp version: dpkg -l | grep xrdp or xrdp -version
  2. Update package repository: apt-get update
  3. Upgrade xrdp package: apt-get install --only-upgrade xrdp
  4. Verify the installed version matches or exceeds v0.9.21: xrdp -version
  5. Restart xrdp service if needed: systemctl restart xrdp or service xrdp restart
  6. Verify the service is running: systemctl status xrdp
Caveat Minor - ensure compatibility with existing RDP clients after upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Debian Linux Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-23479 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-23479 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data