CVE-2022-23507
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTendermint is a high-performance blockchain consensus engine for Byzantine fault tolerant applications. Versions prior to 0.28.0 contain a potential attack via Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature, affecting anyone using the tendermint-light-client and related packages to perform light client verification (e.g. IBC-rs, Hermes). The light client does not check that the chain IDs of the trusted and untrusted headers match, resulting in a possible attack vector where someone who finds a header from an untrusted chain that satisfies all other verification conditions (e.g. enough overlapping validator signatures) could fool a light client. The attack vector is currently theoretical, and no proof-of-concept exists yet to exploit it on live networks. This issue is patched in version 0.28.0. There are no workarounds.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Tendermint light client fails to validate that chain IDs match between trusted and untrusted headers during verification. An attacker could potentially supply a valid header from one blockchain to fool a light client expecting headers from a different chain, exploiting the missing chain ID comparison in the verification logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.28.0< 0.28.0< 0.28.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Tendermint light client packagesInspect your project dependencies or module list. For JavaScript projects, review package.json. For Go projects, review go.mod. Look for packages named 'tendermint-light-client-verifier', 'tendermint-light-client-js', 'tendermint-light-client', or related packages.Affected if Any of these packages are present with version lower than 0.28.0
-
Determine installed package versionRun the appropriate package manager command to list installed versions. For npm: 'npm list <package-name>'. For Go: 'go list -m all' or check vendor directory.Affected if The installed version is 0.27.x or lower, or any version below 0.28.0
-
Check if light client verification is in useSearch your codebase for calls to verification functions such as 'VerifyLightBlock', 'VerifyChain', or header verification methods provided by the Tendermint light client library.Affected if Code invokes light client verification functions and the installed version is below 0.28.0
-
Inspect verification configurationReview configuration files or initialization code where the light client is configured. Look for chain ID settings and how they are handled during header verification.Affected if The light client is configured to verify headers and the version is vulnerable
You are affected if you have any Tendermint light client package installed with a version below 0.28.0 and your application performs header verification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.28.0
Upgrade to Tendermint version 0.28.0 or later, which includes the chain ID validation fix. No workarounds are available.
0.28.0
- Update Tendermint Light Client Verifier dependency to version 0.28.0 or later
- Update Tendermint Light Client Js dependency to version 0.28.0 or later
- Update Tendermint Light Client dependency to version 0.28.0 or later
- Rebuild and redeploy any applications using these packages (e.g., IBC-rs, Hermes)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,192.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-23507 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-23507 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data